WorldCat Identities

Wilmer, Mark

Overview
Works: 11 works in 14 publications in 1 language and 655 library holdings
Roles: Author
Classifications: KF5590.C6,
Publication Timeline
.
Most widely held works by Mark Wilmer
Phoenix newspapers, inc by Mark Wilmer( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Morgan by Mark Wilmer( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Memorandum giving general cross-examination information relative early development period of the Colorado River with specific reference to certain California exhibits by Perley M Lewis( Book )

1 edition published in 1957 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Clarence h. mckinley by Mark Wilmer( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1963 : no. 8 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener, State of Nevada, intervener, State of New Mexico, impleaded defendant, State of Utah, impleaded defendant : statement by Arizona on decree proposed by the United States by Arizona( Book )

1 edition published in 1963 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."--Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author)
Arizona public service company et al., appellants, v. arthur b. snead, etc by Mark Wilmer( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Meek by Mark Wilmer( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

 
Audience Level
0
Audience Level
1
  Kids General Special  
Audience level: 0.35 (from 0.32 for Dividing w ... to 0.79 for Phoenix ne ...)

Languages
English (14)

Covers