WorldCat Identities

Crookston, Emily

Works: 3 works in 23 publications in 1 language and 1,146 library holdings
Genres: Academic theses 
Roles: Author, Editor, Contributor, Author of introduction
Classifications: B105.W3, 355.0201
Publication Timeline
Most widely held works by Emily Crookston
War : essays in political philosophy by Larry May( Book )

17 editions published between 2008 and 2009 in English and held by 629 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

In this anthology, contemporary political philosophers and theorists address normative and conceptual issues concerning war
Ethics in politics by Emily Crookston( Book )

5 editions published between 2016 and 2017 in English and held by 6 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Political ethics, a subfield of applied (or practical) ethics, is concerned with normative questions about voters, politicians, lobbyists, and other individual political agents. Compared with other fields in applied ethics (such as biomedical ethics and business ethics) political ethics has not developed into an area of intense interest in academic philosophy. Debates over the main questions in political ethics occur in mainstream news, on social media, in living rooms and neighborhood bars, etc., but for the most part have not bled over into the pages of philosophy journals and books. This volume aims to (begin to) fill this gap in the philosophical literature. It contains eighteen original papers by a diverse range of leading scholars on central questions in political ethics
John Locke on obligation : sensation, reflection, and the natural duty to consent by Emily Crookston( )

1 edition published in 2009 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Locke's theories of moral and political obligation are instructive both in their successes and in their failures. Writing during a time in which previous assumptions were being widely challenged, Locke judiciously accepts the wisdom of his predecessors as a firm foundation upon which to build his own arguments. Of course, Locke also was not immune to criticism. On the moral obligation side, Locke faces the charge of internal inconsistency: his theory of natural law cannot meet the standards set by his naturalist empiricism. On the political obligation side, critics complain that consent theory is descriptively inadequate: if citizens could consent to their governments, then they would be morally bound. The problem is that most citizens have never consented. So two of Locke's crucial arguments seem to be in trouble. In my dissertation, I take another look at these criticisms. First, I argue that though Locke's natural law theory is too vague to count as a decisive theory of moral obligation, he could enrich his account using features of a Kantian approach in order to develop a coherent and internally consistent theory of moral obligation. In the second half of the dissertation, I build upon this comprehensive theory of moral obligation in order to argue for a more charitable interpretation of Locke's theory of political obligation. According to my view, although consent is necessary and sufficient for political obligation, there are nonetheless universal moral constraints upon the individual choice to consent. Thus, though it is true that individuals are bound to obey only those political institutions to which they have consented, there is a natural moral duty to consent when certain conditions are met. If I am correct, Locke comes closer to having a unified theory of obligation than most scholars give him credit for. By developing a credible theory of moral obligation, which Locke can then use to defend himself against critics of his consent theory of political obligation, I provide Locke with the tools to save both projects
Audience Level
Audience Level
  Kids General Special  
Audience level: 0.30 (from 0.30 for War : essa ... to 0.69 for Ethics in ...)

WorldCat IdentitiesRelated Identities
War : essays in political philosophy
English (23)