Gray, Thomas

Poetry & prose by Thomas Gray ( Book )
12 editions published between 1926 and 1979 in English and Undetermined and held by 108 libraries worldwide

A guide to implementation of training products by Thomas Gray ( Book )
3 editions published in 1983 in English and held by 54 libraries worldwide

Poetical works by Thomas Gray ( Book )
28 editions published between 1780 and 1985 in English and Undetermined and held by 48 libraries worldwide

Gray's poems, letters and essays by Thomas Gray ( Book )
12 editions published between 1937 and 1970 in English and held by 27 libraries worldwide

Nobilissimo, amplissimo, & clarissimo. Georgio, Comiti Marischallo, Domino de Keith, Altrie, &c. Intimo Regis Consiliario by Thomas Gray ( Book )
3 editions published in 1673 in Latin and held by 22 libraries worldwide

The poems of Gray by Thomas Gray ( Book )
3 editions published between 1775 and 1801 in English and held by 14 libraries worldwide

An elegy written in a country church yard by Thomas Gray ( )
14 editions published between 1751 and 1951 in English and Italian and held by 13 libraries worldwide

Poems by Thomas Gray ( Book )
15 editions published between 1768 and 1976 in 3 languages and held by 13 libraries worldwide

Selected poems by Thomas Gray ( Book )
6 editions published between 1885 and 1996 in English and Undetermined and held by 13 libraries worldwide

Experiment to Enhance the Reporting of Drug Use by Arrestees in Cleveland, Detroit, and Houston, 1997 ( )
1 edition published in 2001 in English and held by 12 libraries worldwide
This project involved an experiment conducted in three Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) [DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 (ICPSR 9477)] program sites to determine whether using a more detailed informed consent procedure and/or altering the sequence of the interview and urine specimen collection could enhance the validity of arrestees' self-reports of drug use without adversely affecting study response rates. A 2x2 factorial design was used to assess the effects of the two manipulations. The first two experimental conditions involved administering either the standard DUF informed consent or an enhanced consent that told the arrestees more about the confidential nature of the research and the capabilities of urinalysis. The second two conditions involved collecting the urine specimen either before or after the interview was administered. The experiment included 2,015 adult arrestees from Cleveland, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Houston, Texas, who were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental conditions. The experiment was designed so that the only variability across the interviews was the manipulation of informed consent and the sequencing of the urine specimen request. All other procedures of a standard DUF collection were followed. Data were collected in Cleveland between July 8 and August 22, 1997, in Detroit from August 4 to September 27, 1997, and in Houston from October 17 to November 1, 1997. Variables specific to this project include the experimental condition to which the respondent was assigned, follow-up questions asking whether the arrestee would have responded differently if assigned to the other conditions, and several dummy variables on length and type of drug use. Data from the DUF interview provided detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked wheth... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02890