WorldCat Identities

Clement, Paul D.

Overview
Works: 15 works in 19 publications in 1 language and 461 library holdings
Genres: Trials, litigation, etc  Live sound recordings  Filmed panel discussions 
Roles: Author
Classifications: KF101.9, 324.999
Publication Timeline
.
Most widely held works by Paul D Clement
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld oral arguments( Visual )

1 edition published in 2004 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

"Attorneys presented oral arguments in the case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld which focused on the detention of American citizens captured in hostilities overseas and classified an enemy combatant. At issue were the habeas corpus provisions of the Constitution and a citizen's rights to a hearing upon detention. Mr. Hamdi had been taken into U.S. custody as an enemy combatant in Afghanistan in 2001 and was being held in a military facility in the U.S. This program contained audio released by the Supreme Court immediately after the arguments were presented to the court with still images of participants as they spoke"--Program description
Illinois, petitioner v. Michelle L. Bartels, respondent, on petition for a writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois : reply in support of petition for a writ certiorari by Illinois( Book )

4 editions published in 2006 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Question presented: Whether the court of appeals erred in refusing to set aside the determination by the Bureau of Prisons that petitioner was not entitled to credit against his federal sentence for time he spent in state custody, where credit for that time had been awarded by the State against petitioner's state sentence
[Supreme Court of the United States oral arguments for Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.] by Paul D Clement( )

1 edition published in 2014 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Supreme Court of the United States oral arguments for Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. At issue in the case is the requirement within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that obliges businesses to provide health insurance plans including contraceptives for female employees. Hobby Lobby Inc. seeks to apply the Free Exercise clause within the First Amendment of the Constitution to nullify the statute within the Affordable Care Act and avoid the per employee tax that comes from denying contraceptive-covering insurance. Attorney Paul Drew Clement argues for Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. argues for the United States Government
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld oral argument( Visual )

1 edition published in 2006 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Government and plaintiff attorneys presented oral arguments in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld on the constitutionality of using military commissions to try Al-Qaida members accused of war crimes. Among the issues addressed were precedents for using military commissions and tribunals, whether a state of war existed under which war crimes could be tried, and habeas corpus. Sālim Ahmed Ramdan, a Yemen native, served as the driver and aide to Osama bin Laden until he was captured in Afghanistan and subsequently detained at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He filed a petition of habeas corpus to challenge his confinement. In July 2005 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against Hamdan, saying Congress had authorized the president to set up special tribunals
An address by Paul D. Clement, Solicitor General of the United States( Visual )

1 edition published in 2008 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

United States Solicitor General Paul D. Clement will speak at Duke Law School on Feb. 27, 2008. The event is sponsored by the Program in Public Law. Introduction by Neil Siegel
Thirty-third Annual Vincent S. Dalsimer Moot Court Competition by Pepperdine University( Book )

1 edition published in 2007 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

In the spirit of professional growth, the School of Law sponsors the Vincent S. Dalsimer Moot Court Competition each year. This provides students the opportunity to develop the skills of appellate practice, brief writing, and oral argument. Pepperdine's Moot Court Competition is named for the Honorable Vincent S. Dalsimer, who has served in the capacity of Dean and Associate Dean of the School of Law and is retired from the California State Court of Appeal. Throughout his distinguished career as an attorney, jurist, and legal educator, Justice Dalsimer has been actively involved in the training of trial and appellate advocates. The participants consist of 2nd and 3rd year law students. Each of the 2-person teams has submitted a written brief which has been evaluated and assigned a grade prior to the oral arguments. Brief scores will account for 33% of the score for the preliminary rounds. Each team has argued one preliminary round representing the petitioner and one preliminary round representing the respondent. The top 8 teams presented arguments again in rounds representing both the petitioner and respondent. The teams competed on a single elimination basis culminating in the final round being argued before a 3-judge panel at 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, February 3, 2007, at the Odell McConnell Law Center
Rumsfield [i.e. Rumsfeld] v. Padilla oral arguments( Visual )

1 edition published in 2004 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Attorneys make oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Rumsfeld v. Padilla. The case focuses on writs of habeas corpus for citizens deemed enemy combatants who were arrested on U.S. soil and detained without access to the legal system. This program consists of audio released by the Court with still images of participants as they speak
20th anniversary Speaker Series in Review( Book )

1 edition published in 2006 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Office of the Solicitor General( Visual )

1 edition published in 2009 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

A panel of former U.S. Solicitors General discussed the role of the solicitor general, the duties associated with the job, and arguing before the Supreme Court. The moderator was former Deputy Solicitor General Kenneth Geller. Justice Anthony Kennedy made opening remarks
Limited government : we can defend the federal government and still be sensitive to state and local authorities by Paul D Clement( )

1 edition published in 2007 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Thirtieth Annual Law School Dinner by Pepperdine University( Book )

1 edition published in 2007 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Assertion of executive privilege concerning the dismissal and replacement of U.S. Attorneys [memorandum opinion for] the President by United States( )

1 edition published in 2007 in English and held by 0 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

 
moreShow More Titles
fewerShow Fewer Titles
Audience Level
0
Audience Level
1
  Kids General Special  
Audience level: 0.48 (from 0.47 for Confirmati ... to 0.81 for Illinois, ...)

Alternative Names
Paul Clement Amerikaans advocaat

Paul Clement amerikansk advokat

Paul Clement Avocat general al Statelor Unite (Solicitor General)

Paul Clement US-amerikanischer Jurist, Hochschullehrer und United States Solicitor General

Paul D. Clement

بول كليمنت

پل کلمنت وکیل آمریکایی

ポール・クレメント

保羅·克萊門特

Languages
English (19)