Zoeken naar een online exemplaar
Links naar dit item
Zoeken naar een in de bibliotheek beschikbaar exemplaar
Bibliotheken met dit item worden gezocht…
Details
| Genre: | Document, Scriptie/Dissertatie, Overheidsuitgave, Deelstaats- of provinciale overheidsuitgave, Internetbron |
|---|---|
| Soort document: | Internetbron, Computerbestand |
| Alle auteurs / medewerkers: |
Peter Kilner |
| OCLC-nummer: | 39267246 |
| Opmerkingen: | Title from electronic submission form. Vita. Abstract. |
| Details: | System requirements: PC, World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.; Available electronically via Internet. |
| Verantwoordelijkheid: | Peter Kilner. |
Fragment:
Author's abstract: Just-Warists and War-Pacifists disagree on whether soldiers are morally justified in killing each other in wartime combat. Many of their respective arguments, and their contradictory conclusions, are based upon principles of self-defense. In this thesis, I examine the role that principles of self-defense play in the arguments surrounding the moral justification of killing in combat. I do so by critiquing both a Just-Warist argument that relies on self-defense (constructed from the works of Michael Walzer and Judith Jarvis Thomson) and a War-Pacifist argument (developed by Richard Norman) that condemns killing in combat based on the moral requirements of self-defense. I demonstrate that both arguments fail due to their mistaken assumptions that soldiers are not morally responsible for their actions. I conclude by arguing that--once soldiers are recognized as morally responsible agents--killing in combat can be morally justified by principles of self-defense.
Beoordelingen
Beoordeling toevoegen en deel uw mening met andere lezers.
U bent de eerste
Beoordeling toevoegen en deel uw mening met andere lezers.
U bent de eerste
Tags
Tags toevoegen voor "Soldiers, self-defense, and killing in war".
U bent de eerste.
