• 引证/输出
  引证/输出

  复制引证文献

  APA（第6版）

  

  芝加哥（著者-日期，第15版）

  

  Harvard（第18版）

  

  MLA（第7版）

  

  Turabian（第6版）

  

  输出引证文献

  输出到RefWorks   输出到EndNote / 参考管理（Reference Manager）   输出到EasyBib   删除

  请注意： 这些引证文献都以参考咨询的标準為基础。但是，处理格式的规则，在应用程序、感兴趣或研究的领域之间会大相径庭。应当考虑到负责復审的出版商、上课的教师、机构或者组织的具体要求或者优先选择。
• 打印
• 电子邮件
  电子邮件

  所有的字段都要。

  电邮地址字段是一定要有的。请输入收件人的电子邮件地址。

  输入的电邮地址格式不对。请重新输入收件人的电邮地址。

  最多可将资料送给五个收件人。

  输入收件人的电子邮件地址： 最多能用逗号（,）将五个地址分开

  名字的字段是一定要有的。请输入您的名字。

  输入你的名字： 主题的字段是一定要有的。请输入主题。 主题:

  电子邮件讯息的字段是一定要有的。请输入讯息。

  电子邮件： 我想你可能会对这资料感兴趣，资料位于 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/36024045 题名： Anarchy & culture : the aesthetic politics of modernism 著者： David Weir; Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress) 出版商： Amherst : University of Massachusetts Press, ©1997. ISBN/ISSN: 1558490833 9781558490833 1558490841 9781558490840 OCLC:36024045

  
  

  输入的ReCaptcha词条不对。要设法和显示在窗口中的那两个字一样，也可试用音频版。

  删除
• 共享
• 永久链接
  永久链接

  复制URL以便和网页链接：

• 撰写评论
• 评估这资料：
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

更多类似这样的

主题

• Politics and literature.
• Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- History and criticism.
• Modernism (Literature)
• 查看所有主题

用户列表

相似资料

Anarchy & culture : the aesthetic politics of modernism

著者：	David Weir; Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress)
出版商：	Amherst : University of Massachusetts Press, ©1997.
丛书：	Critical perspectives on modern culture.
版本/格式：	图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要：	Anarchism is generally understood as a failed ideology, a political philosophy that once may have had many followers but today attracts only cranks and eccentrics. This book argues that the decline of political anarchism is only half the story; the other half is a tale of widespread cultural success. David Weir develops this thesis in several ways. He begins by considering the place of culture in the political thought of the classical anarchist thinkers William Godwin, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Mikhail Bakunin, and Peter Kropotkin. He then shows how the perceived "anarchy" of nineteenth-century society induced writers such as Matthew Arnold, Henry James, and Fyodor Dostoyevsky to turn away from politics and seek unity in the idea of a common culture. Yet as other late nineteenth-century writers and artists began to sympathize with anarchism, the prospect of a common culture became increasingly remote. In Weir's view, the affinity for anarchism that developed among members of the artistic avant-garde lies behind much of fin de siecle culture. Indeed, the emergence of modernism itself can be understood as the aesthetic realization of anarchist politics. In support of this contention, Weir shows that anarchism is the key aesthetic principle informing the work of a broad range of modernist figures, from Henrik Ibsen and James Joyce to dadaist Hugo Ball and surrealist Luis Bunuel. Weir concludes by reevaluating the phenomenon of postmodernism as only the most recent case of the migration of politics into aesthetics, and by suggesting that anarchism is still very much with us as a cultural condition.  再读一些...
评估：	(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。