ข้ามไปที่เนือ้หา
Archaism, modernism, and the art of Paul Manship แสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ปิดแสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
Checking...

Archaism, modernism, and the art of Paul Manship

ผู้แต่ง: Susan Rather
สำนักพิมพ์: Austin : University of Texas Press, 1993.
ชุด: American studies series.
ครั้งที่พิมพ์/รูปแบบ:   หนังสือ : รัฐหรือจังหวัด : English : 1st edดูครั้งที่พิมพ์และรูปแบบ
ฐานข้อมูล:WorldCat
สรุป:
Archaism, an international artistic phenomenon from early in the twentieth century through the 1930s, receives its first sustained analysis in this book. The distinctive formal and technical conventions of archaic art, especially Greek art, particularly affected sculptors - some frankly modernist, others staunchly conservative, and a few who, like American Paul Manship, negotiated the distance between tradition and  อ่านมากขึ้น…
คะแนน:

(ยังไม่ให้คะแนน) 0 กับความคิดเห็น - เป็นคนแรก

หัวเรื่อง
เพิ่มเติมเช่นนี้

 

ค้นหาสำเนาในห้องสมุด

กำลังดึงข้อมูล… ค้นหาห้องสมุดที่มีรายการนี้

รายละเอียด

ประเภท/แบบฟอร์ม Criticism, interpretation, etc
รูปแบบทางกายภาพเพิ่มเติม Online version:
Rather, Susan.
Archaism, modernism, and the art of Paul Manship.
Austin : University of Texas Press, 1993
(OCoLC)707181103
ชื่อคน: Paul Manship; Paul Manship; Paul Manship; Paul Manship; Paul Manship
ขนิดวัสดุ: สิ่งพิมพ์รัฐบาล, รัฐหรือจังหวัด
ประเภทของเอกสาร: หนังสือ
ผู้เขียนทั้งหมด : ผู้เขียนร่วม Susan Rather
ISBN: 0292760353 9780292760356
OCLC Number: 25711168
คำอธิบาย: xiv, 268 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
สารบัญ: 1. The American Academy in Rome and the Formation of Manship's Archaism --
2. The Archaeological Background --
3. Archaism as Modernism: Content and Technique --
4. Centaur and Dryad: Manship's Art in Context --
5. Archaism from Other Places and in Other Modes --
6. Archaism during the 1920s and 1930s: Decorative and Monumental --
7. Archaism and the Critics: Disenchantment --
Appendix: "The Decorative Value of Greek Sculpture"
หัวข้อชุด: American studies series.
ความรับผิดชอบ by Susan Rather.

บทคัดย่อ:

Archaism, an international artistic phenomenon from early in the twentieth century through the 1930s, receives its first sustained analysis in this book. The distinctive formal and technical conventions of archaic art, especially Greek art, particularly affected sculptors - some frankly modernist, others staunchly conservative, and a few who, like American Paul Manship, negotiated the distance between tradition and modernity. Professor Susan Rather considers the theory, practice, and criticism of early twentieth-century sculpture in order to reveal the changing meaning and significance of the archaic in the modern world. To this end - and against the background of Manship's career - she explores such topics as the archaeological resources for archaism, the classification of the non-Western art of India as archaic, the interest of sculptors in modern dance (Isadora Duncan and Ruth St. Denis), and the changing critical perception of archaism. Rather rejects the prevailing conception of archaism as a sterile and superficial academic style to argue its initial importance as a modernist mode of expression. The early practitioners of archaism - including Aristide Maillol, Andre Derain, and Constantin Brancusi - renounced the rhetorical excess, overrefined naturalism, and indirect techniques of late nineteenth-century sculpture in favor of nonnarrative, stylized and directly carved works, for which archaic Greek art offered an important example. Their position found implicit support in the contemporaneous theoretical writings of Emmanuel Lowy, Wilhelm Worringer, and Adolf von Hildebrand. The perceived relationship between archaic art and tradition ultimately compromised the modernist authority of archaism and made possible its absorption by academic and reactionary forces during the 1910s. By the 1920s, Paul Manship was identified with archaism, which had become an important element in the aesthetic of public sculpture of both democratic and totalitarian societies. Sculptors often employed archaizing stylizations as ends in themselves and with the intent of evoking the foundations of a classical art diminished in potency by its ubiquity and obsolescence. Such stylistic archaism was not an empty formal exercise but an urgent affirmation of traditional values under siege. Concurrently, archaism entered the mainstream of fashionable modernity as an ingredient in the popular and commercial style known as Art Deco. Both developments fueled the condemnation of archaism - and of Manship, its most visible exemplar - by the avant-garde. Rather's exploration of the critical debate over archaism, finally, illuminates the uncertain relationship to modernism on the part of many critics and highlights the problematic positions of sculpture in the modernist discourse. The first book-length study of archaism and the first critical study of Paul Manship, this work will be important reading in several fields, including American studies and twentieth-century art history. Numerous black-and-white illustrations complement the text.

รีวิว

ความคิดเห็นผู้ที่ใช้งาน
กำลังดึง รีวิว GoodReads…
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

แท็ก

เป็นคนแรก.
ยืนยันคำขอนี้

คุณอาจะร้องขอรายการนี้แล้. โปรดเลือก ตกลง ถ้าคุณต้องการดำเนินการคำขอนี้ต่อไป.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/25711168>
library:oclcnum"25711168"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/25711168>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookEdition"1st ed."
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"1993"
schema:description"Archaism, an international artistic phenomenon from early in the twentieth century through the 1930s, receives its first sustained analysis in this book. The distinctive formal and technical conventions of archaic art, especially Greek art, particularly affected sculptors - some frankly modernist, others staunchly conservative, and a few who, like American Paul Manship, negotiated the distance between tradition and modernity. Professor Susan Rather considers the theory, practice, and criticism of early twentieth-century sculpture in order to reveal the changing meaning and significance of the archaic in the modern world. To this end - and against the background of Manship's career - she explores such topics as the archaeological resources for archaism, the classification of the non-Western art of India as archaic, the interest of sculptors in modern dance (Isadora Duncan and Ruth St. Denis), and the changing critical perception of archaism. Rather rejects the prevailing conception of archaism as a sterile and superficial academic style to argue its initial importance as a modernist mode of expression. The early practitioners of archaism - including Aristide Maillol, Andre Derain, and Constantin Brancusi - renounced the rhetorical excess, overrefined naturalism, and indirect techniques of late nineteenth-century sculpture in favor of nonnarrative, stylized and directly carved works, for which archaic Greek art offered an important example. Their position found implicit support in the contemporaneous theoretical writings of Emmanuel Lowy, Wilhelm Worringer, and Adolf von Hildebrand. The perceived relationship between archaic art and tradition ultimately compromised the modernist authority of archaism and made possible its absorption by academic and reactionary forces during the 1910s. By the 1920s, Paul Manship was identified with archaism, which had become an important element in the aesthetic of public sculpture of both democratic and totalitarian societies. Sculptors often employed archaizing stylizations as ends in themselves and with the intent of evoking the foundations of a classical art diminished in potency by its ubiquity and obsolescence. Such stylistic archaism was not an empty formal exercise but an urgent affirmation of traditional values under siege. Concurrently, archaism entered the mainstream of fashionable modernity as an ingredient in the popular and commercial style known as Art Deco. Both developments fueled the condemnation of archaism - and of Manship, its most visible exemplar - by the avant-garde. Rather's exploration of the critical debate over archaism, finally, illuminates the uncertain relationship to modernism on the part of many critics and highlights the problematic positions of sculpture in the modernist discourse. The first book-length study of archaism and the first critical study of Paul Manship, this work will be important reading in several fields, including American studies and twentieth-century art history. Numerous black-and-white illustrations complement the text."@en
schema:description"1. The American Academy in Rome and the Formation of Manship's Archaism -- 2. The Archaeological Background -- 3. Archaism as Modernism: Content and Technique -- 4. Centaur and Dryad: Manship's Art in Context -- 5. Archaism from Other Places and in Other Modes -- 6. Archaism during the 1920s and 1930s: Decorative and Monumental -- 7. Archaism and the Critics: Disenchantment -- Appendix: "The Decorative Value of Greek Sculpture""@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/28501301>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Archaism, modernism, and the art of Paul Manship"@en
schema:numberOfPages"268"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

ปิดหน้าต่าง

กรุณาลงชื่อเข้าสู่ระบบ WorldCat 

ยังไม่มีบัญชีผู้ใช้? คุณสามารถสร้างได้อย่างง่ายดาย สร้างบัญชีผู้ใช้ฟรี.