ข้ามไปที่เนือ้หา
Believe the change you wish to see in the world : the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias แสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ปิดแสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ตรวจสอบ...

Believe the change you wish to see in the world : the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias

ผู้แต่ง: Aneeta Rattan; Carol S Dweck; Jennifer L Eberhardt; Gregory M Walton; Stanford University. Department of Psychology.
สำนักพิมพ์: 2011.
วิทยานิพนธ์: Thesis (Ph. D.)--Stanford University, 2011.
ครั้งที่พิมพ์/รูปแบบ:   วิทยานิพนธ์ / ดุษฎีนิพนธ์ : เอกสาร : วิทยานิพนธ์ / ดุษฎีนิพนธ์ : หนังสืออีเล็กทรอนิกส์   ไฟล์คอมพิวเตอร์ : ภาษาอังกฤษ
ฐานข้อมูล:WorldCat
สรุป:
What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e.,  อ่านมากขึ้น…
คะแนน:

(ยังไม่ให้คะแนน) 0 กับความคิดเห็น - เป็นคนแรก

 

ค้นหาสำเนาออนไลน์

เชื่อมโยงไปยังรายการนี้

ค้นหาสำเนาในห้องสมุด

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; ค้นหาห้องสมุดที่มีรายการนี้

รายละเอียด

ขนิดวัสดุ: เอกสาร, วิทยานิพนธ์ / ดุษฎีนิพนธ์, ทรัพยากรอินแทอร์เน็ต
ประเภทของเอกสาร: แหล่งข้อมูลอินเทอร์เน็ต, ไฟล์คอมพิวเตอร์
ผู้แต่งทั้งหมด : ผู้แต่งร่วม Aneeta Rattan; Carol S Dweck; Jennifer L Eberhardt; Gregory M Walton; Stanford University. Department of Psychology.
OCLC Number: 747683727
หมายเหตุ: Submitted to the Department of Psychology.
คำอธิบาย: 1 online resource.
ความรับผิดชอบ: Aneeta Rattan.

บทคัดย่อ:

What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people have fixed traits). In Study 1, targets' implicit theories predicted whether they spontaneously confronted an individual who expressed bias. Study 2 replicated this effect and showed that incremental theorists were less likely to anticipate withdrawing from future interactions with an individual who expressed prejudice. In Study 3, I manipulated implicit theories and replicated these findings. Next, I explored one potential explanation for why. I tested the hypothesis that incremental theorists would be more likely to view confronting as effective in creating change than entity theorists, even if both did so. In Study 4, targets who held a more incremental theory reported being more likely to confront prejudice and anticipated their behavior to be more effective. Study 5 elicited African American adults' retrospective accounts of encounters with bias while Studies 6-7 used a hypothetical scenario to expose participants to evidence of someone who had expressed bias either remaining the same or changing over time. The pattern of results across these studies revealed that even when entity and incremental theorists enact the same (actual or anticipated) confronting behavior, it is exclusively the incremental theorists who view this behavior as more efficacious. Study 8 investigated whether implicit theories play a causal role in perceptions of the efficacy of confronting. All targets expressed disagreement with a biased statement, but those in the incremental theory condition expressed the belief that speaking up would create change to a significantly greater degree than did those in the entity theory condition. By highlighting the central role that implicit theories play in targets' motivation to confront prejudice and their perceptions of whether confronting is effective, this research has important implications for intergroup relations and social change.

รีวิว

ความคิดเห็นผู้ที่ใช้งาน
กำลังค้นคืน รีวิว GoodReads…
ค้นคืน DOGObooks บทวิจารณ์

แท็ก

เป็นคนแรก.
ยืนยันคำขอนี้

คุณอาจะร้องขอรายการนี้แล้. โปรดเลือก ตกลง ถ้าคุณต้องการดำเนินการคำขอนี้ต่อไป.

เชิ่อมโยงข้อมูล


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/747683727>
bgn:inSupportOf"Thesis (Ph. D.)--Stanford University, 2011."
library:oclcnum"747683727"
rdf:typebgn:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typej.0:Web_document
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:valueUnknown value: deg
rdf:valueUnknown value: dct
schema:contributor
<http://viaf.org/viaf/263419986>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"Stanford University. Department of Psychology."
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
<http://viaf.org/viaf/6685680>
rdf:typeschema:Person
schema:familyName"Eberhardt"
schema:givenName"Jennifer L."
schema:name"Eberhardt, Jennifer L. (Jennifer Lynn),"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people have fixed traits). In Study 1, targets' implicit theories predicted whether they spontaneously confronted an individual who expressed bias. Study 2 replicated this effect and showed that incremental theorists were less likely to anticipate withdrawing from future interactions with an individual who expressed prejudice. In Study 3, I manipulated implicit theories and replicated these findings. Next, I explored one potential explanation for why. I tested the hypothesis that incremental theorists would be more likely to view confronting as effective in creating change than entity theorists, even if both did so. In Study 4, targets who held a more incremental theory reported being more likely to confront prejudice and anticipated their behavior to be more effective. Study 5 elicited African American adults' retrospective accounts of encounters with bias while Studies 6-7 used a hypothetical scenario to expose participants to evidence of someone who had expressed bias either remaining the same or changing over time. The pattern of results across these studies revealed that even when entity and incremental theorists enact the same (actual or anticipated) confronting behavior, it is exclusively the incremental theorists who view this behavior as more efficacious. Study 8 investigated whether implicit theories play a causal role in perceptions of the efficacy of confronting. All targets expressed disagreement with a biased statement, but those in the incremental theory condition expressed the belief that speaking up would create change to a significantly greater degree than did those in the entity theory condition. By highlighting the central role that implicit theories play in targets' motivation to confront prejudice and their perceptions of whether confronting is effective, this research has important implications for intergroup relations and social change."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1003192523>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Believe the change you wish to see in the world the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias"@en
schema:publication
schema:url<http://purl.stanford.edu/pq033pk1832>
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

กรุณาลงชื่อเข้าสู่ระบบ WorldCat 

ยังไม่มีบัญชีผู้ใช้? คุณสามารถสร้างได้อย่างง่ายดาย สร้างบัญชีผู้ใช้ฟรี.