跳到内容
Believe the change you wish to see in the world : the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias 预览资料
关闭预览资料
正在查...

Believe the change you wish to see in the world : the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias

著者: Aneeta Rattan; Carol S Dweck; Jennifer L Eberhardt; Gregory M Walton; Stanford University. Department of Psychology.
出版商: 2011.
论文: Thesis (Ph. D.)--Stanford University, 2011.
版本/格式:   硕士/博士论文 : 文献 : 硕士论文/博士论文 : 电子图书   计算机文档 : 英语
数据库:WorldCat
提要:
What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e.,  再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在线查找

与资料的链接

在图书馆查找

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

材料类型: 文献, 硕士论文/博士论文, 互联网资源
文件类型: 互联网资源, 计算机文档
所有的著者/提供者: Aneeta Rattan; Carol S Dweck; Jennifer L Eberhardt; Gregory M Walton; Stanford University. Department of Psychology.
OCLC号码: 747683727
注意: Submitted to the Department of Psychology.
描述: 1 online resource.
责任: Aneeta Rattan.

摘要:

What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people have fixed traits). In Study 1, targets' implicit theories predicted whether they spontaneously confronted an individual who expressed bias. Study 2 replicated this effect and showed that incremental theorists were less likely to anticipate withdrawing from future interactions with an individual who expressed prejudice. In Study 3, I manipulated implicit theories and replicated these findings. Next, I explored one potential explanation for why. I tested the hypothesis that incremental theorists would be more likely to view confronting as effective in creating change than entity theorists, even if both did so. In Study 4, targets who held a more incremental theory reported being more likely to confront prejudice and anticipated their behavior to be more effective. Study 5 elicited African American adults' retrospective accounts of encounters with bias while Studies 6-7 used a hypothetical scenario to expose participants to evidence of someone who had expressed bias either remaining the same or changing over time. The pattern of results across these studies revealed that even when entity and incremental theorists enact the same (actual or anticipated) confronting behavior, it is exclusively the incremental theorists who view this behavior as more efficacious. Study 8 investigated whether implicit theories play a causal role in perceptions of the efficacy of confronting. All targets expressed disagreement with a biased statement, but those in the incremental theory condition expressed the belief that speaking up would create change to a significantly greater degree than did those in the entity theory condition. By highlighting the central role that implicit theories play in targets' motivation to confront prejudice and their perceptions of whether confronting is effective, this research has important implications for intergroup relations and social change.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索DOGObooks的评论

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

链接数据


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/747683727>
library:oclcnum"747683727"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/747683727>
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typej.1:Web_document
rdf:typej.1:Thesis
schema:contributor
<http://viaf.org/viaf/263419986>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"Stanford University. Department of Psychology."
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
<http://viaf.org/viaf/6685680>
rdf:typeschema:Person
schema:familyName"Eberhardt"
schema:givenName"Jennifer L."
schema:name"Eberhardt, Jennifer L. (Jennifer Lynn),"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"What motivates targets of prejudice to confront people who express explicit bias? This dissertation reports the results of eight studies investigating this question. In the first three studies, I tested the hypothesis that targets who hold an incremental theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people can change) are more likely to confront prejudice than targets who hold an entity theory of personality (i.e., the belief that people have fixed traits). In Study 1, targets' implicit theories predicted whether they spontaneously confronted an individual who expressed bias. Study 2 replicated this effect and showed that incremental theorists were less likely to anticipate withdrawing from future interactions with an individual who expressed prejudice. In Study 3, I manipulated implicit theories and replicated these findings. Next, I explored one potential explanation for why. I tested the hypothesis that incremental theorists would be more likely to view confronting as effective in creating change than entity theorists, even if both did so. In Study 4, targets who held a more incremental theory reported being more likely to confront prejudice and anticipated their behavior to be more effective. Study 5 elicited African American adults' retrospective accounts of encounters with bias while Studies 6-7 used a hypothetical scenario to expose participants to evidence of someone who had expressed bias either remaining the same or changing over time. The pattern of results across these studies revealed that even when entity and incremental theorists enact the same (actual or anticipated) confronting behavior, it is exclusively the incremental theorists who view this behavior as more efficacious. Study 8 investigated whether implicit theories play a causal role in perceptions of the efficacy of confronting. All targets expressed disagreement with a biased statement, but those in the incremental theory condition expressed the belief that speaking up would create change to a significantly greater degree than did those in the entity theory condition. By highlighting the central role that implicit theories play in targets' motivation to confront prejudice and their perceptions of whether confronting is effective, this research has important implications for intergroup relations and social change."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1003192523>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Believe the change you wish to see in the world the role of implicit theories in targets' responses to explicit bias"@en
schema:url
schema:url<http://purl.stanford.edu/pq033pk1832>

Content-negotiable representations

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.