You are not connected to the Shoen Library network. Access to online content and services may require you to authenticate with your library. Patron Account Logon
Getting this item's online copy...
Find a copy in the library
Getting this item's location and availability...
Find it in libraries globally
|Material Type:||Document, Internet resource|
|Document Type:||Internet Resource, Computer File|
|All Authors / Contributors:||
|Notes:||Title from caption (viewed on Feb. 2, 2010).
"December 11, 2009."
|Details:||Mode of access: World Wide Web.|
|Series Title:||CQ researcher, v. 19, no. 43.|
|Other Titles:||Bilingual education versus English immersion
Which is better for students with limited English?
|Responsibility:||by Kenneth Jost.|
More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers.
Retrieving notes about this item
- Education, Bilingual -- United States.
- Immersion method (Language teaching)
- English language -- Study and teaching (Elementary) -- Foreign speakers.
- Limited English-proficient students -- Education (Elementary)
- English language -- Study and teaching -- Immersion method -- Evaluation.
- English language -- Study and teaching -- Bilingual method -- Evaluation.