跳到内容
Bilingual education vs. English immersion 预览资料
关闭预览资料
正在查...

Bilingual education vs. English immersion

著者: Kenneth Jost
出版商: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 2009.
丛书: CQ researcher, v. 19, no. 43.
版本/格式:   电子图书 : 文献 : 英语
数据库:WorldCat
提要:
More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the  再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

主题
更多类似这样的

 

在线查找

与资料的链接

在图书馆查找

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

类型/形式: Electronic books
材料类型: 文献, 互联网资源
文件类型: 互联网资源, 计算机文档
所有的著者/提供者: Kenneth Jost
OCLC号码: 503099311
注意: Title from caption (viewed on Feb. 2, 2010).
"December 11, 2009."
详述: Mode of access: World Wide Web.
丛书名: CQ researcher, v. 19, no. 43.
其他题名: Bilingual education versus English immersion
Which is better for students with limited English?
责任: by Kenneth Jost.

摘要:

More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索DOGObooks的评论

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

链接数据


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/503099311>
library:oclcnum"503099311"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/503099311>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85043709>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"English language--Study and teaching--Bilingual method--Evaluation."
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00006896>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Limited English-proficient students--Education (Elementary)"
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85043716>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"English language--Study and teaching (Elementary)--Foreign speakers."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89005513>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"English language--Study and teaching--Immersion method--Evaluation."
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/911775>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"English language--Study and teaching (Elementary)--Foreign speakers"
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2009"
schema:description"More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1864298196>
schema:genre"Electronic books."
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Bilingual education versus English immersion"
schema:name"Bilingual education vs. English immersion"
schema:name"Which is better for students with limited English?"
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2009121100>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.