跳至内容
Bilingual education vs. English immersion 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽
正在查...

Bilingual education vs. English immersion

作者: Kenneth Jost
出版商: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 2009.
叢書: CQ researcher, v. 19, no. 43.
版本/格式:   電子書 : 文獻 : 英語
資料庫:WorldCat
提要:
More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the  再讀一些...
評定級別:

(尚未評分) 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

主題
更多類似這樣的

 

在線上查詢

與資料的連結

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

類型/形式: Electronic books
資料類型: 文獻, 網際網路資源
文件類型: 網路資源, 電腦資料
所有的作者/貢獻者: Kenneth Jost
OCLC系統控制編碼: 503099311
注意: Title from caption (viewed on Feb. 2, 2010).
"December 11, 2009."
詳述: Mode of access: World Wide Web.
叢書名: CQ researcher, v. 19, no. 43.
其他題名: Bilingual education versus English immersion
Which is better for students with limited English?
責任: by Kenneth Jost.

摘要:

More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers.

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

成爲第一個
確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

連結資料


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/503099311>
library:oclcnum"503099311"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:valueUnknown value: dct
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/911775>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"English language--Study and teaching (Elementary)--Foreign speakers"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:alternateName"Which is better for students with limited English?"
schema:alternateName"Bilingual education versus English immersion"
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2009"
schema:description"More than 5 million public school students have limited English proficiency, and the number is growing. Most English learners enter school behind fluent English speakers, and many never catch up either in language or other academic areas. In the 1960s and '70s, the federal government supported bilingual education: teaching English learners in both their native language and in English. A backlash developed in the 1980s and '90s among critics who attacked bilingual education as academically ineffective and politically divisive. They favored instead some form of "English immersion." Educators and policy makers continue to wage bitter debates on the issue, with each of the opposing camps claiming that research studies support its position. Some experts say the debate should focus instead on providing more resources, including more and better-trained teachers."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1864298196>
schema:genre"Electronic books"
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Bilingual education vs. English immersion"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2009121100>
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.