passa ai contenuti
A black and white case : how affirmative action survived its greatest legal challenge Anteprima di questo documento
ChiudiAnteprima di questo documento
Stiamo controllando…

A black and white case : how affirmative action survived its greatest legal challenge

Autore: Greg Stohr
Editore: Princeton : Bloomberg Press, 2004.
Edizione/Formato:   Libro : English : 1st edVedi tutte le edizioni e i formati
Banca dati:WorldCat
Sommario:
"In the late 1990's, two lawsuits by white applicants who had been rejected by the University of Michigan began working their way through the federal court system, aimed at the abolition of racial preferences in college admissions. The stakes were high, the constitutional questions profound, the politics and emotions explosive. It was soon evident that the matter was headed for the highest court in the land, but  Per saperne di più…
Voto:

(non ancora votato) 0 con commenti - Diventa il primo.

Soggetti
Altri come questo

 

Trova una copia online

Collegamenti a questo documento

Trova una copia in biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Stiamo ricercando le biblioteche che possiedono questo documento…

Dettagli

Persona incaricata: Barbara Grutter; Jennifer Gratz; Lee C Bollinger; Lee C Bollinger; Jennifer Gratz; Barbara Grutter
Tipo materiale: Risorsa internet
Tipo documento: Book, Internet Resource
Tutti gli autori / Collaboratori: Greg Stohr
ISBN: 1576601706 9781576601709
Numero OCLC: 55067087
Descrizione: xi, 333 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
Contenuti: A tale of two professors --
Getting lawyered up --
Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher --
Equal protection --
Arguments Michigan wouldn't make --
A clash in chambers --
Accepted on the spot --
Bollinger's new front --
Duggan's distinction --
Preferences on trial --
A court divided --
Martin v. Boggs --
Looking to the high court --
The most powerful woman in America --
Friends of the court --
"She's fabulous" --
"Race unfortunately still matters" --
Hail to the victors.
Responsabilità: Greg Stohr.
Maggiori informazioni:

Abstract:

"In the late 1990's, two lawsuits by white applicants who had been rejected by the University of Michigan began working their way through the federal court system, aimed at the abolition of racial preferences in college admissions. The stakes were high, the constitutional questions profound, the politics and emotions explosive. It was soon evident that the matter was headed for the highest court in the land, but there all clarity ended." "In A Black and White Case, veteran Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr portrays the individual dramas and exposes the human passions that colored and propelled this momentous legal struggle. His fascinating account takes us deep inside America's court system, where logic collides with emotion, and common sense must contend with the majesty and sometimes the seeming perversity of the law. He follows the trail from Michigan to Washington, D.C., revealing how lawyers argued and strategized, how lower-court judges fought behind the scenes for control of the cases, and why the White House filed a brief in support of the white students." "Finally, Stohr details the fallout from the Supreme Court's controversial 2003 ruling that both upheld affirmative action and upended some of the methods that had been used to effect it. And he shows how colleges and universities are reshaping their affirmative action policies - an evolution closely watched by lower courts, employers, civil rights lawyers, legislators, regulators, and the public."--BOOK JACKET.

Commenti

Commenti degli utenti
Recuperando commenti GoodReads…
Stiamo recuperando commenti DOGObooks

Etichette

Diventa il primo.
Conferma questa richiesta

Potresti aver già richiesto questo documento. Seleziona OK se si vuole procedere comunque con questa richiesta.

Dati collegati


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/55067087>
library:oclcnum"55067087"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1765592>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Affirmative action programs in education--Law and legislation."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1161630>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Universities and colleges--Admission--Law and legislation."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/895079>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Discrimination in higher education--Law and legislation."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookEdition"1st ed."
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2004"
schema:description"A tale of two professors -- Getting lawyered up -- Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher -- Equal protection -- Arguments Michigan wouldn't make -- A clash in chambers -- Accepted on the spot -- Bollinger's new front -- Duggan's distinction -- Preferences on trial -- A court divided -- Martin v. Boggs -- Looking to the high court -- The most powerful woman in America -- Friends of the court -- "She's fabulous" -- "Race unfortunately still matters" -- Hail to the victors."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1054469>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"A black and white case : how affirmative action survived its greatest legal challenge"@en
schema:numberOfPages"333"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:reviews
rdf:typeschema:Review
schema:itemReviewed<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/55067087>
schema:reviewBody""In the late 1990's, two lawsuits by white applicants who had been rejected by the University of Michigan began working their way through the federal court system, aimed at the abolition of racial preferences in college admissions. The stakes were high, the constitutional questions profound, the politics and emotions explosive. It was soon evident that the matter was headed for the highest court in the land, but there all clarity ended." "In A Black and White Case, veteran Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr portrays the individual dramas and exposes the human passions that colored and propelled this momentous legal struggle. His fascinating account takes us deep inside America's court system, where logic collides with emotion, and common sense must contend with the majesty and sometimes the seeming perversity of the law. He follows the trail from Michigan to Washington, D.C., revealing how lawyers argued and strategized, how lower-court judges fought behind the scenes for control of the cases, and why the White House filed a brief in support of the white students." "Finally, Stohr details the fallout from the Supreme Court's controversial 2003 ruling that both upheld affirmative action and upended some of the methods that had been used to effect it. And he shows how colleges and universities are reshaping their affirmative action policies - an evolution closely watched by lower courts, employers, civil rights lawyers, legislators, regulators, and the public."--BOOK JACKET."
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Chiudi finestra

Per favore entra in WorldCat 

Non hai un account? Puoi facilmente crearne uno gratuito.