aller au contenu
Bush v. Gore : the question of legitimacy Aperçu de cet ouvrage
FermerAperçu de cet ouvrage
Vérifiant…

Bush v. Gore : the question of legitimacy

Auteur : Bruce A Ackerman
Éditeur : New Haven : Yale University Press, ©2002.
Édition/format :   Livre : AnglaisVoir toutes les éditions et tous les formats
Base de données :WorldCat
Résumé :
The Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore  Lire la suite...
Évaluation :

(pas encore évalué) 0 avec des critiques - Soyez le premier.

Sujets
Plus comme ceci

 

Trouver un exemplaire en ligne

Liens vers cet ouvrage

Trouver un exemplaire dans la bibliothèque

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Recherche de bibliothèques qui possèdent cet ouvrage...

Détails

Genre/forme : Trials, litigation, etc
Personne nommée : George W Bush; Al Gore; George W Bush; Albert Gore
Type d’ouvrage : Ressource Internet
Format : Livre, Ressource Internet
Tous les auteurs / collaborateurs : Bruce A Ackerman
ISBN : 0300093799 9780300093797 0300093802 9780300093803
Numéro OCLC : 48876497
Description : xiii, 240 p. ; 22 cm.
Contenu : 1. Unreasonable reaction to a reasonable decision / Charles Fried --
2. Not as bad as Plessy. Worse / Jed Rubenfeld --
3. eroG v. hsuB : through the looking glass / Laurence H. Tribe --g 4. In partial (but not partisan) praise of principle / Guido Calabresi --
5. Fallibility of reason / Owen Fiss --
6. Sustaining the premise of legality : learning to live with Bush v. Gore / Robert Post --
7. Can the rule of law survive Bush v. Gore / Margaret Jane Radin --
8. Political question / Steven G. Calabresi --
9. Political questions and the hazards of pragmatism / Jeffrey Rosen --
10. Conservatism in Bush v. Gore / Mark Tushnet. 11. Does the Constitution enact the Republican Party platform? : beyond Bush v. Gore / Cass R. Sunstein --
12. Off balance / Bruce Ackerman --
13. Legitimacy and the 2000 election / Jack M. Balkin.
Autres titres : Bush versus Gore
Responsabilité : edited by Bruce Ackerman.

Résumé :

The Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments? The contributors -- Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenreid, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet -- represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate.

Critiques

Critiques d’utilisateurs
Récupération des critiques de GoodReads...
Récuperation des critiques DOGObooks…

Tags

Soyez le premier.
Confirmez cette demande

Vous avez peut-être déjà demandé cet ouvrage. Veuillez sélectionner OK si vous voulez poursuivre avec cette demande quand même.

Données liées


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48876497>
library:oclcnum"48876497"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:alternateName"Bush versus Gore"@en
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2002"
schema:datePublished"2002"
schema:description"The Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments? The contributors -- Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenreid, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet -- represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/899280893>
schema:genre"Trials, litigation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Bush v. Gore : the question of legitimacy"@en
schema:numberOfPages"240"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Fermer la fenêtre

Veuillez vous identifier dans WorldCat 

Vous n’avez pas de compte? Vous pouvez facilement créer un compte gratuit.