skip to content
The Cambridge controversies in capital theory : a study in the logic of theory development
ClosePreview this item

The Cambridge controversies in capital theory : a study in the logic of theory development

Author: Jack Birner
Publisher: London ; New York : Routledge, 2002.
Series: Routledge studies in the history of economics, 47.
Edition/Format:   Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Summary:
"A controversy in capital theory dominated economics in the 1960s and 1970s. Economists based in Cambridge, England detected flaws in the production model of neoclassical economics, associated with Cambridge, America. This debate established that the aggregate measure K for capital could not be used except in very special cases despite its still common usage in real business cycle theory today.".
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

 

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Jack Birner
ISBN: 0415073480 9780415073486
OCLC Number: 45002220
Description: xviii, 206 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
Contents: The K that wouldn't go away --
The sleepwalker effect --
Levels and problems --
Idealizations and the method of economics: some historical background --
The way forward --
A brief exposition of reswitching and capital reversing --
The model --
Characteristic propositions of neoclassical production theory --
Perversities and anomalies --
The background of the debate: some history --
Robinson's research programme --
Discontinuities in the recent history of economic thought --
Clouds in the neoclassical sky --
Robinson defines the problem --
Champernowne's solution --
Robinson returns to the problem --
Taking methodological stock (I) --
The Polish idealization model --
Back to the capital theory debate --
Correspondence and factualization --
An excursion into the philosophy of science --
Better roughly right than precisely wrong? --
An example of correspondence --
Triumph and crisis of the neoclassical production model --
Neoclassical triumph --
Crisis for the neoclassical model --
Taking methodological stock (II) --
The antipodean idealization model --
Aiming at a complete model of idealizations --
From curiosum to issue --
A little theorem with big consequences --
The symposium --
Neoclassical reactions --
Hicks hunts the snark --
Brown pursues the trail --
More neoclassical resources are mobilized --
Taking methodological stock (III) --
Tactics and moves --
Strategies and likelihoods --
AIM and PIM reconsidered --
Weapons --
The role of mathematics --
Mathematics as a neutral instrument.
Series Title: Routledge studies in the history of economics, 47.
Responsibility: Jack Birner.
More information:

Abstract:

This book explains the debate over the Cambridge controversies of the 1960s and 1970s. In a compelling and comprehensive argument Birner discusses the main contributions to the controversy in a  Read more...

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/45002220>
library:oclcnum"45002220"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/45002220>
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdfs:seeAlso
rdfs:seeAlso
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Neoklassische Theorie."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:author
schema:datePublished"2002"
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The Cambridge controversies in capital theory : a study in the logic of theory development"
schema:numberOfPages"206"
schema:publisher
schema:reviews
rdf:typeschema:Review
schema:itemReviewed<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/45002220>
schema:reviewBody""A controversy in capital theory dominated economics in the 1960s and 1970s. Economists based in Cambridge, England detected flaws in the production model of neoclassical economics, associated with Cambridge, America. This debate established that the aggregate measure K for capital could not be used except in very special cases despite its still common usage in real business cycle theory today."."
Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.