• Cite/Export
  Cite/Export

  Copy a citation

  APA (6th ed.)

  

  Chicago (Author-Date, 15th ed.)

  

  Harvard (18th ed.)

  

  MLA (7th ed.)

  

  Turabian (6th ed.)

  

  Export a citation

  Export to RefWorks   Export to EndNote / Reference Manager   Export to EasyBib   Cancel

  Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.
• Print
• E-mail
  E-mail

  All fields are required.

  The E-mail Address(es) field is required. Please enter recipient e-mail address(es).

  The E-mail Address(es) you entered is(are) not in a valid format. Please re-enter recipient e-mail address(es).

  You may send this item to up to five recipients.

  Enter recipient e-mail address(es): Separate up to five addresses with commas (,)

  The name field is required. Please enter your name.

  Enter your name: The subject field is required. Please enter the subject. Subject:

  The E-mail message field is required. Please enter the message.

  E-mail Message: I thought you might be interested in this item at http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/51842394 Title: Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision Author: Lloyd S Dixon; Brian P Gill Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : Rand Institute for Civil Justice, 2001. ISBN/ISSN: 0833030884 9780833030887 OCLC:51842394

  
  

  The ReCaptcha terms you entered were incorrect. Please try to match the 2 words shown in the window, or try the audio version.

  Cancel
• Share
• Permalink
  Permalink

  Copy this URL to link to this page:

• Write a review
• Rate this item:
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

More like this

Subjects

• Evidence, Expert -- United States.
• Civil procedure -- United States.
• LAW / Civil Law

Similar Items

Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision

Author:	Lloyd S Dixon; Brian P Gill
Publisher:	Santa Monica, CA : Rand Institute for Civil Justice, 2001.
Edition/Format:	Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Summary:	In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the expert evidence and to admit only evidence that was reliable and relevant. This study examines how judges have changed the way they evaluate expert evidence since Daubert and how the parties proposing and challenging evidence have responded as a result.  Read more...
Rating:	(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.