在线查找
与期刊/刊物的链接
在图书馆查找
正在查找有这资料的图书馆...
详细书目
| 文件类型: | 文章 |
|---|---|
| 所有的著者/提供者: | Emília P Martins; Terry J Ord; Sarah W Davenport |
| ISSN: | 0340-5443 |
| OCLC号码: | 481068264 |
| 语言注释: | English |
| 注意: | Fig. 2 A comparison of time male subjects spent producing headbob displays to different treatment stimuli. This measure was combined with other measures of visual displays in PC2, and yielded a significant effect for 'moving/nonmoving' (robot/live animal versus empty tank/no robot) in MANOVAs. An interaction effect which tests for a difference between responses to robotic and live stimuli was not statistically significant. See Table 2 and text for details Fig. 3 Sex differences in Experiment 2 match social differences in the wild. a Males moved about their cages less when presented with the 'stilted' display forms typical of short-distance aggressive encounters for this species in the field. b Females spent a greater proportion of time orient away from the 'long, flat' displays used by males to court females and the 'long, stilted' displays indicative of aggressive encounters, but orient towards the 'short, flat' displays typical of female-female aggression. Sex text for details |
| 奖励: |
摘要:
Complex displays composed of multiple, seemingly independent, units can result from sexual selection for increasingly variable, but redundant, displays and from potentially opposing selective pressures imposed by use of the display in multiple contexts. Our playback results support the latter, multireceiver hypothesis by confirming that two aspects of the sagebrush lizard headbob display (number of headbobs and use of display-specific body postures) are independently-meaningful components that are interpreted differently by different receivers. Male receivers use species-typical body postures to distinguish between aggressive and broadcast forms of the display, whereas female receivers are more attentive to the number of headbob motions, using these to distinguish male courtship from a challenge from a female competitor. Thus, display components are likely subject to different selective pressures and the display as a whole is evolving in response to a complex selective regime. Our example differs from other complex signals that have been considered in that both display elements involve dynamic motions (turned on and off by the display producer) as opposed to static signal elements (e.g., color, size). In addition, we found evidence that display structure is highly malleable, and that lizards both produce and respond to artificial displays that violate syntactic rules identified from field observations. Finally, our experiments demonstrate that a robotic lizard can be used effectively in playback studies of visual display behavior in lizards.
