• 引证/输出
  引证/输出

  复制引证文献

  APA（第6版）

  

  芝加哥（著者-日期，第15版）

  

  Harvard（第18版）

  

  MLA（第7版）

  

  Turabian（第6版）

  

  输出引证文献

  输出到RefWorks   输出到EndNote / 参考管理（Reference Manager）   输出到EasyBib   删除

  请注意： 这些引证文献都以参考咨询的标準為基础。但是，处理格式的规则，在应用程序、感兴趣或研究的领域之间会大相径庭。应当考虑到负责復审的出版商、上课的教师、机构或者组织的具体要求或者优先选择。
• 打印
• 电子邮件
  电子邮件

  所有的字段都要。

  电邮地址字段是一定要有的。请输入收件人的电子邮件地址。

  输入的电邮地址格式不对。请重新输入收件人的电邮地址。

  最多可将资料送给五个收件人。

  输入收件人的电子邮件地址： 最多能用逗号（,）将五个地址分开

  名字的字段是一定要有的。请输入您的名字。

  输入你的名字： 主题的字段是一定要有的。请输入主题。 主题:

  电子邮件讯息的字段是一定要有的。请输入讯息。

  电子邮件： 我想你可能会对这资料感兴趣，资料位于 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48450945 题名： Contentious curricula : Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools 著者： Amy J Binder 出版商： Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, ©2002. ISBN/ISSN: 0691091803 9780691091808 069111790X 9780691117904 OCLC:48450945

  
  

  输入的ReCaptcha词条不对。要设法和显示在窗口中的那两个字一样，也可试用音频版。

  删除
• 共享
• 永久链接
  永久链接

  复制URL以便和网页链接：

• 撰写评论
• 评估这资料：
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

更多类似这样的

主题

• Curriculum change -- United States.
• Social movements -- United States.
• Afrocentrism -- Study and teaching -- United States.
• 查看所有主题

用户列表

相似资料

Contentious curricula : Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools

著者：	Amy J Binder
出版商：	Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, ©2002.
丛书：	Princeton studies in cultural sociology.
版本/格式：	图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要：	"This book compares two challenges made to American public school curricula in the 1980s and 1990s. It identifies striking similarities between proponents of Afrocentrism and creationism, accounts for their differential outcomes, and draws important conclusions for the study of culture, organizations, and social movements." "Amy Binder gives a brief history of both movements and then describes how their challenges played out in seven school districts. Despite their very different constituencies - inner-city African American cultural essentialists and predominately white suburban Christian conservatives - Afrocentrists and creationists had much in common. Both made similar arguments about oppression and their children's well-being, both faced skepticism from educators about their factual claims, and both mounted their challenges through bureaucratic channels. In each case, challenged school systems were ultimately able to minimize or reject challengers' demands, but the process varied by case and type of challenge. Binder finds that Afrocentrists were more successful in advancing their cause than were creationists because they appeared to offer a solution to the real problem of urban school failure, met with more administrative sympathy toward their complaints of historic exclusion, sought to alter lower-prestige curricula (history, not science), and faced opponents who lacked a legal remedy comparable to the rule of church-state separation invoked by creationism's opponents." "Binder's analysis yields several lessons for social movements research, suggesting that researchers need to pay greater attention to how movements seek to influence bureaucratic decision making, often from within. It also demonstrates the benefits of examining discursive, structural, and institutional factors in concert."--Jacket.  再读一些...
评估：	(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。