skip to content
Covert Action: A Very American Dilemma Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Covert Action: A Very American Dilemma

Author: David S Sedney; NATIONAL WAR COLL WASHINGTON DC.
Publisher: Ft. Belvoir Defense Technical Information Center JAN 1999.
Edition/Format:   eBook : English
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
Perhaps no other issue so starkly lays out the fault lines between the idealistic and realistic strains in American foreign policy as does the subject of covert action. The title of this essay consciously reflects that of Gunnar Myrdal's classic study of race in America, "An American Dilemma." Myrdal posited, accurately, that the conflict between stated American ideals of freedom, democracy, and equal justice and  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Material Type: Internet resource
Document Type: Internet Resource
All Authors / Contributors: David S Sedney; NATIONAL WAR COLL WASHINGTON DC.
OCLC Number: 74286540
Description: 12 p.

Abstract:

Perhaps no other issue so starkly lays out the fault lines between the idealistic and realistic strains in American foreign policy as does the subject of covert action. The title of this essay consciously reflects that of Gunnar Myrdal's classic study of race in America, "An American Dilemma." Myrdal posited, accurately, that the conflict between stated American ideals of freedom, democracy, and equal justice and the realities of race discrimination created a tension that America would inevitably have to address. Beginning with World War II and Franklin Roosevelt's fascination with General "Wild Bill" Donovan and the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), U.S. leaders have seen covert action as an attractive tool for a dangerous world. Many proponents of covert action justify its use in "realist" terms. While the author does not detail them in this paper, there are strong arguments for using covert action, especially when carried out as part of an agreed-upon public policy and with adequate oversight and review. Generally, these arguments focus on two elements: necessity (i.e., extreme threats call for extreme responses) and effectiveness (i.e., some things can only be done covertly). However, neither of these arguments addresses the heart of the issue: that covert action is basically antithetical to the values that the United States espouses and to the policies that it would like other countries to adopt. In a society that fundamentally adheres to democratic ideals, covert action, by its very nature, creates a basic conflict. After first detailing why this is so, particularly for the United States, this paper will examine the continuing consequences of the use of covert action on the United States, on the image of its citizens as Americans, and on its role in the world.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/74286540>
library:oclcnum"74286540"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/74286540>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:datePublished"1999"
schema:datePublished"JAN 1999"
schema:description"Perhaps no other issue so starkly lays out the fault lines between the idealistic and realistic strains in American foreign policy as does the subject of covert action. The title of this essay consciously reflects that of Gunnar Myrdal's classic study of race in America, "An American Dilemma." Myrdal posited, accurately, that the conflict between stated American ideals of freedom, democracy, and equal justice and the realities of race discrimination created a tension that America would inevitably have to address. Beginning with World War II and Franklin Roosevelt's fascination with General "Wild Bill" Donovan and the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), U.S. leaders have seen covert action as an attractive tool for a dangerous world. Many proponents of covert action justify its use in "realist" terms. While the author does not detail them in this paper, there are strong arguments for using covert action, especially when carried out as part of an agreed-upon public policy and with adequate oversight and review. Generally, these arguments focus on two elements: necessity (i.e., extreme threats call for extreme responses) and effectiveness (i.e., some things can only be done covertly). However, neither of these arguments addresses the heart of the issue: that covert action is basically antithetical to the values that the United States espouses and to the policies that it would like other countries to adopt. In a society that fundamentally adheres to democratic ideals, covert action, by its very nature, creates a basic conflict. After first detailing why this is so, particularly for the United States, this paper will examine the continuing consequences of the use of covert action on the United States, on the image of its citizens as Americans, and on its role in the world."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/60628294>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Covert Action: A Very American Dilemma"@en
schema:numberOfPages"12"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:url<http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA443793>

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.