skip to content
De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it

Author: Peter Kivy
Publisher: Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2015. ©2015
Edition/Format:   Print book : English : First editionView all editions and formats
Summary:
In 'De Gustibus' Peter Kivy deals with a question that has never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do we argue about art? We argue about the 'facts' of the world either to influence people's behaviour or simply to get them to see what we take to be the truth about the world. We argue over ethical matters, if we are ethical 'realists, ' because we think we are arguing about 'facts' in the world. And we  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Peter Kivy
ISBN: 9780198746782 0198746784
OCLC Number: 913853282
Description: xii, 173 pages ; 23 cm
Contents: Hume's Dilemma --
A Ground Common to All --
The Beautiful Versus the Good (in the Eighteenth Century) --
Simple Emotivism --
Do So as Well --
The Aesthetic Shrug --
Immoral Art --
Is Bad Taste Immoral? --
Push-Pin and Poetry --
Back to Square One --
The Right Phenomenology? --
The Truth of Interpretation --
The Truth of Analysis --
The Truth of Evaluation --
Common Sense and the Error Theory.
Responsibility: Peter Kivy.

Abstract:

Peter Kivy deals with a question that has never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do we argue about art? If I think Bach is greater than Beethoven and you think the opposite, why  Read more...

Reviews

Editorial reviews

Publisher Synopsis

Peter Kivy's defence of aesthetic realism is to argue that it is incoherent to be an error theorist and still engage in aesthetic disputes. * Barry C. Smith, Times Literary Supplement *

 
User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.

Similar Items

Related Subjects:(3)

User lists with this item (2)

Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


Primary Entity

<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/913853282> # De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it
    a schema:CreativeWork, schema:Book ;
    library:oclcnum "913853282" ;
    library:placeOfPublication <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/countries/enk> ;
    schema:about <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/N70> ;
    schema:about <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Topic/arts_philosophy_and_aesthetics> ; # Arts--Philosophy and aesthetics
    schema:about <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Topic/art_philosophy> ; # Art--Philosophy
    schema:about <http://dewey.info/class/700/> ;
    schema:about <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Topic/aesthetics> ; # Aesthetics
    schema:author <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Person/kivy_peter> ; # Peter Kivy
    schema:bookEdition "First edition." ;
    schema:bookFormat bgn:PrintBook ;
    schema:copyrightYear "2015" ;
    schema:datePublished "2015" ;
    schema:description "In 'De Gustibus' Peter Kivy deals with a question that has never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do we argue about art? We argue about the 'facts' of the world either to influence people's behaviour or simply to get them to see what we take to be the truth about the world. We argue over ethical matters, if we are ethical 'realists, ' because we think we are arguing about 'facts' in the world. And we argue about ethics, if we are 'emotivists, ' or are now what are called 'expressionists, ' which is to say, people who think matters of ethics are simply matters of 'attitude, ' to influence the behaviour of others. But why should we argue about works of art? There are no 'actions' we wish to motivate. Whether I think Bach is greater than Beethoven and you think the opposite, why should it matter to either of us to convince the other? This is a question that philosophers have never faced. Kivy claims here that we argue over taste because we think, mistakenly or not, that we are arguing over matters of fact."@en ;
    schema:exampleOfWork <http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/2770708490> ;
    schema:inLanguage "en" ;
    schema:name "De gustibus : arguing about taste and why we do it"@en ;
    schema:productID "913853282" ;
    schema:workExample <http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780198746782> ;
    wdrs:describedby <http://www.worldcat.org/title/-/oclc/913853282> ;
    .


Related Entities

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Person/kivy_peter> # Peter Kivy
    a schema:Person ;
    schema:familyName "Kivy" ;
    schema:givenName "Peter" ;
    schema:name "Peter Kivy" ;
    .

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/2770708490#Topic/arts_philosophy_and_aesthetics> # Arts--Philosophy and aesthetics
    a schema:Intangible ;
    schema:name "Arts--Philosophy and aesthetics"@en ;
    .

<http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780198746782>
    a schema:ProductModel ;
    schema:isbn "0198746784" ;
    schema:isbn "9780198746782" ;
    .


Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.