zum Inhalt wechseln
Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system Titelvorschau
SchließenTitelvorschau
Prüfung…

Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system

Verfasser/in: Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
Verlag: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, ©2011.
Serien: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
Ausgabe/Format   Buch : EnglischAlle Ausgaben und Formate anzeigen
Datenbank:WorldCat
Zusammenfassung:
As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence.
Bewertung:

(noch nicht bewertet) 0 mit Rezensionen - Verfassen Sie als Erste eine Rezension.

Themen
Ähnliche Titel

 

Exemplar ausleihen

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Suche nach Bibliotheken, die diesen Titel besitzen ...

Details

Physisches Format Online version:
Debating reform.
Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, c2011
(OCoLC)741490557
Dokumenttyp: Buch
Alle Autoren: Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
ISBN: 9781604265521 1604265523
OCLC-Nummer: 453820675
Beschreibung: xxiv, 365 p. : ill., maps ; 23 cm.
Inhalt: Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig --
Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell --
The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis --
Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer --
Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk --
The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein --
Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush --
The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes --
The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell --
The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --
The Senate should represent people, not states / pro: Bruce I. Oppenheimer ; con: John J. Pitney Jr. --
Senate Rule XXII should be amended so that filibusters can be ended by a majority vote / pro: Steven S. Smith ; con: Wendy J. Schiller --
The president should be granted line item veto / pro: Michael Nelson ; con: Robert J. Spitzer --
The government should scale back the outsourcing of government jobs to private contractors / pro: Charles T. Goodsell ; con: E.S. Savas --
The terms of Supreme Court justices should be limited to eighteen years / pro: Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren ; con: Ward Farnsworth --
The United States should adopt an "emergency constitution" to preserve civil liberties in an age of terrorism / pro: Bruce Ackerman ; con: Patrick O. Gudridge --
Residents who are not citizens should be granted the right to vote / pro: Ron Hayduk ; con: Stanley A. Renshon --
The government should require national service for all youth / pro: Robert E. Litan ; con: Tod Lindberg --
The federal government should ensure that no firm is too big to fail / pro: Lawrence G. Baxter ; con: Terence M. Hynes --
Congress should pass the War Powers Constitution Act / pro: Nancy Kassop ; con: William G. Howell.
Serientitel: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
Verfasserangabe: edited by Richard J. Ellis and Michael Nelson.

Abstract:

Containing pro and con pieces about a variety of issues, this text encourages students to examine and evaluate arguments without relying on their own opinion.  Weiterlesen…

Rezensionen

Nutzer-Rezensionen
Suche nach GoodReads-Rezensionen
Suche nach DOGObooks-Rezensionen…

Tags

Tragen Sie als Erste Tags ein.

Ähnliche Titel

Anfrage bestätigen

Sie haben diesen Titel bereits angefordert. Wenn Sie trotzdem fortfahren möchten, klicken Sie auf OK.

Verlinkung


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/453820675>
library:oclcnum"453820675"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig -- Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell -- The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis -- Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer -- Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk -- The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein -- Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush -- The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes -- The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell -- The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --"@en
schema:description"Connecting classroom conversation directly to political institutions, students not only grapple with reform ideas but also join the discussion without the crutch of personal opinion. With pro and con pieces written specifically for this volume, readers consider and evaluate arguments from top scholars, thoughtfully exploring the ways government could work better."@en
schema:description"As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/865017459>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system"@en
schema:numberOfPages"365"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Fenster schließen

Bitte in WorldCat einloggen 

Sie haben kein Konto? Sie können sehr einfach ein kostenloses Konto anlegen,.