pular para conteúdo
Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system Ver prévia deste item
FecharVer prévia deste item
Checando...

Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system

Autor: Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
Editora: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, ©2011.
Séries: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
Edição/Formato   Print book : InglêsVer todas as edições e formatos
Base de Dados:WorldCat
Resumo:
As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence.
Classificação:

(ainda não classificado) 0 com críticas - Seja o primeiro.

Assuntos
Mais como este

 

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que possuem este item...

Detalhes

Formato Físico Adicional: Online version:
Debating reform.
Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, c2011
(OCoLC)741490557
Tipo de Documento: Livro
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
ISBN: 9781604265521 1604265523
Número OCLC: 453820675
Descrição: xxiv, 365 p. : ill., maps ; 23 cm.
Conteúdos: Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig --
Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell --
The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis --
Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer --
Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk --
The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein --
Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush --
The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes --
The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell --
The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --
The Senate should represent people, not states / pro: Bruce I. Oppenheimer ; con: John J. Pitney Jr. --
Senate Rule XXII should be amended so that filibusters can be ended by a majority vote / pro: Steven S. Smith ; con: Wendy J. Schiller --
The president should be granted line item veto / pro: Michael Nelson ; con: Robert J. Spitzer --
The government should scale back the outsourcing of government jobs to private contractors / pro: Charles T. Goodsell ; con: E.S. Savas --
The terms of Supreme Court justices should be limited to eighteen years / pro: Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren ; con: Ward Farnsworth --
The United States should adopt an "emergency constitution" to preserve civil liberties in an age of terrorism / pro: Bruce Ackerman ; con: Patrick O. Gudridge --
Residents who are not citizens should be granted the right to vote / pro: Ron Hayduk ; con: Stanley A. Renshon --
The government should require national service for all youth / pro: Robert E. Litan ; con: Tod Lindberg --
The federal government should ensure that no firm is too big to fail / pro: Lawrence G. Baxter ; con: Terence M. Hynes --
Congress should pass the War Powers Constitution Act / pro: Nancy Kassop ; con: William G. Howell.
Título da Série: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
Responsabilidade: edited by Richard J. Ellis and Michael Nelson.

Resumo:

Containing pro and con pieces about a variety of issues, this text encourages students to examine and evaluate arguments without relying on their own opinion.  Ler mais...

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários
Recuperando críticas GoodReas...
Recuperando comentários DOGObooks

Etiquetas

Seja o primeiro.
Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Dados Ligados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/453820675>
library:oclcnum"453820675"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig -- Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell -- The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis -- Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer -- Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk -- The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein -- Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush -- The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes -- The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell -- The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --"@en
schema:description"Connecting classroom conversation directly to political institutions, students not only grapple with reform ideas but also join the discussion without the crutch of personal opinion. With pro and con pieces written specifically for this volume, readers consider and evaluate arguments from top scholars, thoughtfully exploring the ways government could work better."@en
schema:description"As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/865017459>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system"@en
schema:numberOfPages"365"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.