ข้ามไปที่เนือ้หา
Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system แสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ปิดแสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ตรวจสอบ...

Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system

ผู้แต่ง: Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
สำนักพิมพ์: Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, ©2011.
ชุด: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
ครั้งที่พิมพ์/รูปแบบ:   Print book : ภาษาอังกฤษดูครั้งที่พิมพ์และรูปแบบ
ฐานข้อมูล:WorldCat
สรุป:
As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence.
คะแนน:

(ยังไม่ให้คะแนน) 0 กับความคิดเห็น - เป็นคนแรก

หัวเรื่อง
เพิ่มเติมเช่นนี้

 

ค้นหาสำเนาในห้องสมุด

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; ค้นหาห้องสมุดที่มีรายการนี้

รายละเอียด

รูปแบบทางกายภาพเพิ่มเติม Online version:
Debating reform.
Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, c2011
(OCoLC)741490557
ประเภทของเอกสาร: หนังสือ
ผู้แต่งทั้งหมด : ผู้แต่งร่วม Richard Ellis; Michael Nelson
ISBN: 9781604265521 1604265523
OCLC Number: 453820675
คำอธิบาย: xxiv, 365 p. : ill., maps ; 23 cm.
สารบัญ: Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig --
Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell --
The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis --
Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer --
Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk --
The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein --
Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush --
The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes --
The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell --
The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --
The Senate should represent people, not states / pro: Bruce I. Oppenheimer ; con: John J. Pitney Jr. --
Senate Rule XXII should be amended so that filibusters can be ended by a majority vote / pro: Steven S. Smith ; con: Wendy J. Schiller --
The president should be granted line item veto / pro: Michael Nelson ; con: Robert J. Spitzer --
The government should scale back the outsourcing of government jobs to private contractors / pro: Charles T. Goodsell ; con: E.S. Savas --
The terms of Supreme Court justices should be limited to eighteen years / pro: Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren ; con: Ward Farnsworth --
The United States should adopt an "emergency constitution" to preserve civil liberties in an age of terrorism / pro: Bruce Ackerman ; con: Patrick O. Gudridge --
Residents who are not citizens should be granted the right to vote / pro: Ron Hayduk ; con: Stanley A. Renshon --
The government should require national service for all youth / pro: Robert E. Litan ; con: Tod Lindberg --
The federal government should ensure that no firm is too big to fail / pro: Lawrence G. Baxter ; con: Terence M. Hynes --
Congress should pass the War Powers Constitution Act / pro: Nancy Kassop ; con: William G. Howell.
ชื่อชุด: Debating politics series from CQ Press.
ความรับผิดชอบ: edited by Richard J. Ellis and Michael Nelson.

บทคัดย่อ:

Containing pro and con pieces about a variety of issues, this text encourages students to examine and evaluate arguments without relying on their own opinion.  อ่านมากขึ้น…

รีวิว

ความคิดเห็นผู้ที่ใช้งาน
กำลังค้นคืน รีวิว GoodReads…
ค้นคืน DOGObooks บทวิจารณ์

แท็ก

เป็นคนแรก.

รายการคล้ายกัน

หัวเรื่องที่เกี่ยวข้อง:(9)

บัญชีรายชื่อผู้ใช้พร้อมกับรายการนี้ (2)

ยืนยันคำขอนี้

คุณอาจะร้องขอรายการนี้แล้. โปรดเลือก ตกลง ถ้าคุณต้องการดำเนินการคำขอนี้ต่อไป.

เชิ่อมโยงข้อมูล


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/453820675>
library:oclcnum"453820675"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Article V should be revised to make it easier to amend the Constitution and to call a constitutional convention / pro: Sanford Levinson ; con: David E. Kyvig -- Congress should restore each state's freedom to set its drinking age / pro: John McCardell ; con: James C. Fell -- The United States should adopt a national initiative and referendum / pro: Todd Donovan ; con: Richard J. Ellis -- Broadcasters should be charged a spectrum fee to finance programming in the public interest / pro: Norman J. Ornstein ; con: Adam D. Thierer -- Political parties should nominate candidates for president in a national primary / pro: Caroline J. Tolbert ; con: David P. Redlawsk -- The electoral college should be abolished / pro: George C. Edwards III ; con: Daniele H. Lowenstein -- Proportional representation should be adopted for U.S. House elections / pro: Douglas J. Amy ; con: Mark E. Rush -- The "no cup of coffee" rule should be adopted in Washington / pro: Burdett Loomis ; con: Anthony J. Nownes -- The size of the House of Representatives should be increased to 675 seats / pro: Brian Frederick ; con: C. Lawrence Evans and Nicholas J. Bell -- The redistricting process should be nonpartisan / pro: Michael p. McDonald ; con: Justin Buchler --"@en
schema:description"Connecting classroom conversation directly to political institutions, students not only grapple with reform ideas but also join the discussion without the crutch of personal opinion. With pro and con pieces written specifically for this volume, readers consider and evaluate arguments from top scholars, thoughtfully exploring the ways government could work better."@en
schema:description"As much as policy topics like abortion and same-sex marriage elicit spirited reactions from your students, aren't you looking for ways to get them out of their partisan corners? Ellis and Nelson have found that debating concrete proposals for reforming the political system encourages undergraduates to leave ideology behind and instead sift through competing claims and evidence."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/865017459>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Debating reform : conflicting perspectives on how to fix the American political system"@en
schema:numberOfPages"365"
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

กรุณาลงชื่อเข้าสู่ระบบ WorldCat 

ยังไม่มีบัญชีผู้ใช้? คุณสามารถสร้างได้อย่างง่ายดาย สร้างบัญชีผู้ใช้ฟรี.