컨텐츠로 이동
Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well

저자: Danny Oppenheimer; Mike Edwards
출판사: Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2012.
판/형식:   도서 : 영어모든 판과 형식 보기
데이터베이스:WorldCat
요약:
"Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

 

온라인으로 문서 찾기

이 항목에 대한 링크

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

자료 유형: 인터넷 자료
문서 형식: 책, 인터넷 자원
모든 저자 / 참여자: Danny Oppenheimer; Mike Edwards
ISBN: 9780262017237 0262017237
OCLC 번호: 746489179
설명: 245 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
내용: pt. 1. Democracy is crazy. Don't know much about ... well, anything, really ; "We the people" are irrational ; Electoral madness ; Too many voices --
pt. 2. Restoring some sanity. Procedure, process, and prophecy ; Letting off steam ; Overcoming our weaknesses ; Throwing the bums out --
Conclusion : The means justify the ends.
책임: Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards.

초록:

"Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent sentence, democracy works exceptionally well: citizens of democracies are healthier, happier, and freer than citizens of other countries. In Democracy Despite Itself, Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards explore this seeming paradox: How can democracy lead to such successful outcomes when the defining characteristic of democracy, elections, is so flawed?

Oppenheimer, a psychologist, and Edwards, a political scientist, draw on cutting-edge research in their fields to investigate the question and suggest an answer.

Oppenheimer and Edwards argue that democracy works because regular elections, no matter how flawed, produce a variety of unintuitive, positive consequences. Mass participation in contested elections creates psychological pressure for voters to be better citizens and for politicians to be better leaders; alternating power regularly between different factions helps avoid instability; citizens are sometimes able to overcome their ignorance and make informed choices; and voters do have the power to punish politicians for excessively bad behavior. The brilliance of democracy, write Oppenheimer and Edwards, does not lie in the people's ability to pick superior leaders. It lies in the many ways that it subtly encourages the flawed people and their flawed leaders to work toward building a better society."--Pub. desc.

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

첫번째 되기

유사 항목

관련 주제:(2)

이 항목을 가지고 있는 사용자 목록 (2)

요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

링크된 데이터


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/746489179>
library:oclcnum"746489179"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/746489179>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1169246>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Voting--Psychological aspects"@en
schema:name"Voting--Psychological aspects."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/890093>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Democracy--Psychological aspects"@en
schema:name"Democracy--Psychological aspects."@en
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2012"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2012"
schema:description"Oppenheimer and Edwards argue that democracy works because regular elections, no matter how flawed, produce a variety of unintuitive, positive consequences. Mass participation in contested elections creates psychological pressure for voters to be better citizens and for politicians to be better leaders; alternating power regularly between different factions helps avoid instability; citizens are sometimes able to overcome their ignorance and make informed choices; and voters do have the power to punish politicians for excessively bad behavior. The brilliance of democracy, write Oppenheimer and Edwards, does not lie in the people's ability to pick superior leaders. It lies in the many ways that it subtly encourages the flawed people and their flawed leaders to work toward building a better society."--Pub. desc."@en
schema:description""Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent sentence, democracy works exceptionally well: citizens of democracies are healthier, happier, and freer than citizens of other countries. In Democracy Despite Itself, Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards explore this seeming paradox: How can democracy lead to such successful outcomes when the defining characteristic of democracy, elections, is so flawed?"@en
schema:description"Oppenheimer, a psychologist, and Edwards, a political scientist, draw on cutting-edge research in their fields to investigate the question and suggest an answer."@en
schema:description"pt. 1. Democracy is crazy. Don't know much about ... well, anything, really ; "We the people" are irrational ; Electoral madness ; Too many voices -- pt. 2. Restoring some sanity. Procedure, process, and prophecy ; Letting off steam ; Overcoming our weaknesses ; Throwing the bums out -- Conclusion : The means justify the ends."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/987584816>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.