pular para conteúdo
Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well Ver prévia deste item
FecharVer prévia deste item
Checando...

Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well

Autor: Danny Oppenheimer; Mike Edwards
Editora: Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2012.
Edição/Formato   Livro : InglêsVer todas as edições e formatos
Base de Dados:WorldCat
Resumo:
"Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent
Classificação:

(ainda não classificado) 0 com críticas - Seja o primeiro.

Assuntos
Mais como este

 

Encontrar uma cópia on-line

Links para este item

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que possuem este item...

Detalhes

Tipo de Material: Recurso Internet
Tipo de Documento: Livro, Recurso Internet
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: Danny Oppenheimer; Mike Edwards
ISBN: 9780262017237 0262017237 0262525216 9780262525213
Número OCLC: 746489179
Descrição: 245 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
Conteúdos: pt. 1. Democracy is crazy. Don't know much about ... well, anything, really ; "We the people" are irrational ; Electoral madness ; Too many voices --
pt. 2. Restoring some sanity. Procedure, process, and prophecy ; Letting off steam ; Overcoming our weaknesses ; Throwing the bums out --
Conclusion : The means justify the ends.
Responsabilidade: Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards.

Resumo:

"Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent sentence, democracy works exceptionally well: citizens of democracies are healthier, happier, and freer than citizens of other countries. In Democracy Despite Itself, Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards explore this seeming paradox: How can democracy lead to such successful outcomes when the defining characteristic of democracy, elections, is so flawed?

Oppenheimer, a psychologist, and Edwards, a political scientist, draw on cutting-edge research in their fields to investigate the question and suggest an answer.

Oppenheimer and Edwards argue that democracy works because regular elections, no matter how flawed, produce a variety of unintuitive, positive consequences. Mass participation in contested elections creates psychological pressure for voters to be better citizens and for politicians to be better leaders; alternating power regularly between different factions helps avoid instability; citizens are sometimes able to overcome their ignorance and make informed choices; and voters do have the power to punish politicians for excessively bad behavior. The brilliance of democracy, write Oppenheimer and Edwards, does not lie in the people's ability to pick superior leaders. It lies in the many ways that it subtly encourages the flawed people and their flawed leaders to work toward building a better society."--Pub. desc.

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários
Recuperando críticas GoodReas...
Recuperando comentários DOGObooks

Etiquetas

Etiquetas de todos os usuários (1)

Ver as etiquetas mais populares como: lista de etiquetas | nuvem de etiquetas

Ítens Similares

Assuntos Relacionados:(6)

Listas de usuários com este item (2)

Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Dados Ligados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/746489179>
library:oclcnum"746489179"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/746489179>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1169246>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Voting--Psychological aspects"@en
schema:name"Voting--Psychological aspects."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/890093>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Democracy--Psychological aspects"@en
schema:name"Democracy--Psychological aspects."@en
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2012"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2012"
schema:description"Oppenheimer and Edwards argue that democracy works because regular elections, no matter how flawed, produce a variety of unintuitive, positive consequences. Mass participation in contested elections creates psychological pressure for voters to be better citizens and for politicians to be better leaders; alternating power regularly between different factions helps avoid instability; citizens are sometimes able to overcome their ignorance and make informed choices; and voters do have the power to punish politicians for excessively bad behavior. The brilliance of democracy, write Oppenheimer and Edwards, does not lie in the people's ability to pick superior leaders. It lies in the many ways that it subtly encourages the flawed people and their flawed leaders to work toward building a better society."--Pub. desc."@en
schema:description""Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer-brief dichotomy and politicians who struggle to put together a coherent sentence, democracy works exceptionally well: citizens of democracies are healthier, happier, and freer than citizens of other countries. In Democracy Despite Itself, Danny Oppenheimer and Mike Edwards explore this seeming paradox: How can democracy lead to such successful outcomes when the defining characteristic of democracy, elections, is so flawed?"@en
schema:description"Oppenheimer, a psychologist, and Edwards, a political scientist, draw on cutting-edge research in their fields to investigate the question and suggest an answer."@en
schema:description"pt. 1. Democracy is crazy. Don't know much about ... well, anything, really ; "We the people" are irrational ; Electoral madness ; Too many voices -- pt. 2. Restoring some sanity. Procedure, process, and prophecy ; Letting off steam ; Overcoming our weaknesses ; Throwing the bums out -- Conclusion : The means justify the ends."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/987584816>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Democracy despite itself : why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.