• 引证/输出
  引证/输出

  复制引证文献

  APA（第6版）

  

  芝加哥（著者-日期，第15版）

  

  Harvard（第18版）

  

  MLA（第7版）

  

  Turabian（第6版）

  

  输出引证文献

  输出到RefWorks   输出到EndNote / 参考管理（Reference Manager）   输出到EasyBib   删除

  请注意： 这些引证文献都以参考咨询的标準為基础。但是，处理格式的规则，在应用程序、感兴趣或研究的领域之间会大相径庭。应当考虑到负责復审的出版商、上课的教师、机构或者组织的具体要求或者优先选择。
• 打印
• 电子邮件
  电子邮件

  所有的字段都要。

  电邮地址字段是一定要有的。请输入收件人的电子邮件地址。

  输入的电邮地址格式不对。请重新输入收件人的电邮地址。

  最多可将资料送给五个收件人。

  输入收件人的电子邮件地址： 最多能用逗号（,）将五个地址分开

  名字的字段是一定要有的。请输入您的名字。

  输入你的名字： 主题的字段是一定要有的。请输入主题。 主题:

  电子邮件讯息的字段是一定要有的。请输入讯息。

  电子邮件： 我想你可能会对这资料感兴趣，资料位于 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/45703753 题名： Disputed territories : interstate arbitrations in the northeast Peloponnese, ca. 250-150 B.C. 著者： Michael D Dixon 出版商： 2000. OCLC:45703753

  
  

  输入的ReCaptcha词条不对。要设法和显示在窗口中的那两个字一样，也可试用音频版。

  删除
• 共享
• 永久链接
  永久链接

  复制URL以便和网页链接：

• 撰写评论
• 评估这资料：
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Disputed territories : interstate arbitrations in the northeast Peloponnese, ca. 250-150 B.C.

著者：	Michael D Dixon
论文：	Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2000.
版本/格式：	硕士/博士论文 : 硕士论文/博士论文 : 手稿  档案资料 : 英语
提要：	Abstract: This dissertation examines the phenomenon of interstate arbitration in the northeast Peloponnese between the years 250-150 B. C. Following 250 B.C. a number of Peloponnesian city-states joined the recently reformed Achaian League, changing its composition dramatically since none of these new members were ethnically Achaians. Of these new Achaian League members Corinth, Epidauros, Hermion, and Troizen were all at some time involved in territorial disputes with their neighbors. On two separate occasions Epidauros and Troizen each became involved in a dispute with the Ptolemaic colony of Arsinoë; (Methana). Our sources for these territorial disputes is almost exclusively epigraphic and it is with the inscriptional evidence that this study begins. The majority of the inscriptions studied here were set up originally in the Asklepieion of Epidauros (IG IV².1.70+59, 71, 72, 74, 75+, and 76+77) while one was found in Hermion (SEG XI 377) and another in Troizen (IG IV 752). Presented first in each chapter is a new edition of each inscription followed by a detailed epigraphical commentary on each stone. After this a commentary on the date and historical circumstances of each dispute is presented. Finally each chapter concludes with a topographical commentary on the disputed territory with conclusions suggested as to what the land was used for and why the land was contested. This examination of interstate arbitration also allows us to make some conclusions concerning the relationships between Achaian League members as well as the relations between the League and the Ptolemies. The argument is made here that Achaian members submitted their disputes for arbitration with the hope of territorial aggrandizement, as well as for the control of land that was more productive than previous scholars have believed. Ptolemaic Arsinoë, on the other hand, enjoyed cordial relations with its Achaian neighbors while the League and the Ptolemies were allied and it was during these times that outstanding disputes were settled by arbitration.  再读一些...
评估：	(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。