zum Inhalt wechseln
Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis Titelvorschau
SchließenTitelvorschau
Prüfung…

Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis

Verfasser/in: Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Verlag: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
Serien: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Ausgabe/Format   E-Book : Dokument : EnglischAlle Ausgaben und Formate anzeigen
Datenbank:WorldCat
Zusammenfassung:
"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific  Weiterlesen…
Bewertung:

(noch nicht bewertet) 0 mit Rezensionen - Verfassen Sie als Erste eine Rezension.

Themen
Ähnliche Titel

 

Exemplar ausleihen

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Suche nach Bibliotheken, die diesen Titel besitzen ...

Details

Medientyp: Dokument, Internetquelle
Dokumenttyp: Internet-Ressource, Computer-Datei
Alle Autoren: Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC-Nummer: 60802557
Anmerkungen: June 2005.
Title from first page of PDF document.
Beschreibung: 1 online resource (51 p.) : ill.
Serientitel: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Verfasserangabe: Fiona Murray, Scott Stern.

Abstract:

"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Rezensionen

Nutzer-Rezensionen
Suche nach GoodReads-Rezensionen
Suche nach DOGObooks-Rezensionen…

Tags

Tragen Sie als Erste Tags ein.
Anfrage bestätigen

Sie haben diesen Titel bereits angefordert. Wenn Sie trotzdem fortfahren möchten, klicken Sie auf OK.

Verlinkung


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60802557>
library:oclcnum"60802557"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/60802557>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/975778>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1054870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1145009>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095185>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Research--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2005"
schema:description""While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/438587721>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://0-papers.nber.org.biblio.eui.eu/papers/>
schema:url
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11465>

Content-negotiable representations

Fenster schließen

Bitte in WorldCat einloggen 

Sie haben kein Konto? Sie können sehr einfach ein kostenloses Konto anlegen,.