přejít na obsah
Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis

Autor Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Vydavatel: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
Edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Vydání/formát:   e-kniha : Document : EnglishZobrazit všechny vydání a formáty
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Najít online exemplář

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Typ materiálu: Document, Internetový zdroj
Typ dokumentu: Internet Resource, Computer File
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC číslo: 60802557
Poznámky: June 2005.
Title from first page of PDF document.
Popis: 1 online resource (51 p.) : ill.
Název edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Odpovědnost: Fiona Murray, Scott Stern.

Anotace:

"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.
Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60802557>
library:oclcnum"60802557"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/60802557>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/975778>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1054870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1145009>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095185>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Research--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2005"
schema:description""While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/438587721>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://0-papers.nber.org.biblio.eui.eu/papers/>
schema:url
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11465>

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.