omitir hasta el contenido
Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis Ver este material de antemano
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? : an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis

Autor: Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Editorial: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
Serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Edición/Formato:   Libro-e : Documento : Inglés (eng)Ver todas las ediciones y todos los formatos
Base de datos:WorldCat
Resumen:
"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific  Leer más
Calificación:

(todavía no calificado) 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Temas
Más materiales como éste

 

Encontrar un ejemplar en línea

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Tipo de material: Documento, Recurso en Internet
Tipo de documento: Recurso en Internet, Archivo de computadora
Todos autores / colaboradores: Fiona E S Murray; Scott Stern; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Número OCLC: 60802557
Notas: June 2005.
Title from first page of PDF document.
Descripción: 1 online resource (51 p.) : ill.
Título de la serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 11465.
Responsabilidad: Fiona Murray, Scott Stern.

Resumen:

"While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Reseñas

Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Ser el primero.
Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60802557>
library:oclcnum"60802557"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/60802557>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/975778>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Intellectual property--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1054870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects"@en
schema:name"Patents--Economic aspects."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1145009>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Technological innovations--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095185>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Econometric models"@en
schema:name"Research--Econometric models."@en
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2005"
schema:description""While the potential for intellectual property rights to inhibit the diffusion of scientific knowledge is at the heart of several contemporary policy debates, evidence for the "anti-commons effect" has been anecdotal. A central issue in this debate is how intellectual property rights over a given piece of knowledge affects the propensity of future researchers to build upon that knowledge in their own scientific research activities. This article frames this debate around the concept of dual knowledge, in which a single discovery may contribute to both scientific research and useful commercial applications. A key implication of dual knowledge is that it may be simultaneously instantiated as a scientific research article and as a patent. Such patent-paper pairs are at the heart of our empirical strategy. We exploit the fact that patents are granted with a substantial lag, often many years after the knowledge is initially disclosed through paper publication. The knowledge associated with a patent paper pair therefore diffuses within two distinct intellectual property environments %u2013 one associated with the pre-grant period and another after formal IP rights are granted. Relative to the expected citation pattern for publications with a given quality level, anticommons theory predicts that the citation rate to a scientific publication should fall after formal IP rights associated with that publication are granted. Employing a differences-indifferences estimator for 169 patent-paper pairs (and including a control group of publications from the same journal for which no patent is granted), we find evidence for a modest anti-commons effect (the citation rate after the patent grant declines by between 9 and 17%). This decline becomes more pronounced with the number of years elapsed since the date of the patent grant, and is particularly salient for articles authored by researchers with public sector affiliations"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/438587721>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? an empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://0-papers.nber.org.biblio.eui.eu/papers/>
schema:url
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11465>

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.