přejít na obsah
Effect of divided attention on inadvertent plagiarism for young and older adults Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

Effect of divided attention on inadvertent plagiarism for young and older adults

Autor Andrew J Kelly
Vydavatel: Atlanta, Ga. : Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008.
Dizertace: Thesis (M. S.)--Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008.
Vydání/formát:   Kvalifikační práce : Document : Thesis/dissertation : Manuscript : State or province government publication : e-kniha   Archival Material   Computer File : English
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
Older adults inadvertently plagiarize more than young adults (McCabe, Smith, & Parks, 2007). One current explanation proposes that this effect can be understood in terms of age-related declines in working and episodic memory (McCabe et al., 2007). The current study tested this hypothesis by placing groups of young and older adult participants under divided attention while performing within the typical experimental  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Najít online exemplář

Odkazy na tento dokument

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Typ materiálu: Document, Thesis/dissertation, Government publication, Manuscript, State or province government publication, Internetový zdroj
Typ dokumentu: Internet Resource, Computer File, Archival Material
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: Andrew J Kelly
OCLC číslo: 268995426
Poznámky: Committee Chair: Smith, Anderson; Committee Member: Hertzog, Christopher; Committee Member: Rogers, Wendy.
Popis: 1 v. (various pagings) : digital, PDF file
Odpovědnost: by Andrew J. Kelly.

Anotace:

Older adults inadvertently plagiarize more than young adults (McCabe, Smith, & Parks, 2007). One current explanation proposes that this effect can be understood in terms of age-related declines in working and episodic memory (McCabe et al., 2007). The current study tested this hypothesis by placing groups of young and older adult participants under divided attention while performing within the typical experimental paradigm. Results indicated that for some measures, dividing the attention of young adults equated their performance to older adults with full attention. For other measures, older adults still produced more errors. Except for false recall, regression analyses revealed that episodic and working memory accounted for age-related variance in these plagiarism errors. The current findings provide tenuous support for the McCabe et al. (2007) hypothesis and suggest other factors may be at play.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.
Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/268995426>
library:oclcnum"268995426"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/268995426>
rdf:typej.2:Web_document
rdf:typej.2:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2008"
schema:description"Older adults inadvertently plagiarize more than young adults (McCabe, Smith, & Parks, 2007). One current explanation proposes that this effect can be understood in terms of age-related declines in working and episodic memory (McCabe et al., 2007). The current study tested this hypothesis by placing groups of young and older adult participants under divided attention while performing within the typical experimental paradigm. Results indicated that for some measures, dividing the attention of young adults equated their performance to older adults with full attention. For other measures, older adults still produced more errors. Except for false recall, regression analyses revealed that episodic and working memory accounted for age-related variance in these plagiarism errors. The current findings provide tenuous support for the McCabe et al. (2007) hypothesis and suggest other factors may be at play."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/156292519>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Effect of divided attention on inadvertent plagiarism for young and older adults"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:url<http://hdl.handle.net/1853/22617>

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.