跳到内容
Effects of a Transmission Line on Bird Populations in the Red Lake Peatland, Northern Minnesota
关闭预览资料

Effects of a Transmission Line on Bird Populations in the Red Lake Peatland, Northern Minnesota

著者: Gerald J Niemi; JoAnn M Hanowski
版本/格式: 文章 文章 : 英语
刊登在:The Auk, Jul., 1984, vol. 101, no. 3, p. 487-498
数据库:JSTOR
提要:
 再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在线查找

与期刊/刊物的链接

在图书馆查找

正在检索... 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

文件类型: 文章
所有的著者/提供者: Gerald J Niemi; JoAnn M Hanowski
ISSN:0004-8038
OCLC号码: 485039859
语言注释: English
奖励:

摘要:

The effects of a 500-kV transmission line on bird populations were assessed by comparing paired treatment areas [which included a transmission line and right-of-way (ROW)] with similar control areas in six different habitat types during the breeding and migration seasons. Habitat structure was measured to examine the inherent differences between control and treatment areas. Using two census methods, territorial mapping and transect counts, we determined that Sedge Wrens and LeConte's Sparrows had lower breeding-population densities in treatment areas than in control areas. LeConte's Sparrows and Connecticut Warblers occurred at greater mean distances from the transmission line in treatment areas than from a similarly positioned line in control areas. Fifteen paired t-tests (five habitats in 3 yr), in which territorial mapping data were used, revealed that community densities were lower in one treatment habitat (high shrub) in 1 of 3 yr (P < 0.05). A two-way analysis of variance with transect counts, however, was not confirmatory when yearly variation was included. Transect counts revealed lower population densities in one treatment habitat (low shrub) in 2 of 3 yr (P < 0.05). In contrast, we observed greater species richness (P < 0.05) in two treatment habitats (closed spruce and sedge fen) than in controls. Treatment habitats were most similar in habitat structure to their paired control habitats, but each habitat of the pair was significantly different (P < 0.05) from the other in at least 2 of 10 habitat characteristics analyzed. We suggest that the avian differences observed between paired areas were primarily attributable to (1) the inherent habitat differences between control and treatment areas, and (2) the new habitat created under the transmission line. Our data indicated negligible effects of this transmission line on bird populations, but interpretations are difficult, because the effects varied with (1) habitat, (2) season, and (3) method considered. Postimpact studies, which compare control and treatment areas, are less effective than before-and-after studies, because differences in habitat structure exist between any two areas.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在检索weRead中的评论...
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索Amazon中的评论...

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

您可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.