přejít na obsah
The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest

Autor John Timothy Jacobs; John Ferns
Vydavatel: ©2003.
Dizertace: Thesis (Ph. D.)--McMaster University, 2003.
Vydání/formát:   Kvalifikační práce : Thesis/dissertation : Manuscript   Archival Material : EnglishZobrazit všechny vydání a formáty
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges.  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Najít online exemplář

Odkazy na tento dokument

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Osoba: David Foster Wallace; David Foster Wallace; Gerard Manley Hopkins; Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Typ materiálu: Thesis/dissertation, Manuscript, Internetový zdroj
Typ dokumentu: Book, Archival Material, Internet Resource
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: John Timothy Jacobs; John Ferns
OCLC číslo: 181810287
Poznámky: Advisor: John Ferns.
Popis: vii, 241 leaves ; 28 cm
Odpovědnost: by John Timothy Jacobs.
Více informací:

Anotace:

There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges. David Foster Wallace's <italic>Infinite Jest</italic> (1996) represents these challenges, and much more; it is at once an encyclopedic novel of 1079 pages, full of both liberal arts and scientific erudition, and an encomium to an apocalyptic end of late millennial American culture. The novel is highly allegorical and operates with three crucial subtexts, in addition to the standard diegetic narrative. In this study, I present three different, though not mutually exclusive, interpretations of this novel, a novel that has presented interpretive difficulties to scholars of contemporary fiction. In Part One, I survey and compare Wallace's aesthetic with the radical, yet self-contained, aesthetic of the poet, G.M. Hopkins; Part Two examines the integral concept of mediation and explores the subtext of the return of the dead author & mdash;the novel operates, in part, as a rejoinder to the death-of-the-author critical impasse; Part Three is primarily comparative and analyzes Fyodor Dostoevsky's <italic>The Brothers Karamazov</italic> (1880). Wallace has rewritten (or reimagined) Dostoevsky's novel and translated it into a contemporary context and idiom as a remedy for postmodern American solipsism.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.
Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/181810287>
library:oclcnum"181810287"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/181810287>
rdf:typej.1:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1356765>
rdf:typeschema:CreativeWork
schema:name"Bratʹi︠a︡ Karamazovy (Dostoyevsky, Fyodor)"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2003"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2003"
schema:description"There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges. David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest (1996) represents these challenges, and much more; it is at once an encyclopedic novel of 1079 pages, full of both liberal arts and scientific erudition, and an encomium to an apocalyptic end of late millennial American culture. The novel is highly allegorical and operates with three crucial subtexts, in addition to the standard diegetic narrative. In this study, I present three different, though not mutually exclusive, interpretations of this novel, a novel that has presented interpretive difficulties to scholars of contemporary fiction. In Part One, I survey and compare Wallace's aesthetic with the radical, yet self-contained, aesthetic of the poet, G.M. Hopkins; Part Two examines the integral concept of mediation and explores the subtext of the return of the dead author & mdash;the novel operates, in part, as a rejoinder to the death-of-the-author critical impasse; Part Three is primarily comparative and analyzes Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov (1880). Wallace has rewritten (or reimagined) Dostoevsky's novel and translated it into a contemporary context and idiom as a remedy for postmodern American solipsism."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/500093829>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest"@en
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.