pular para conteúdo
The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest Ver prévia deste item
FecharVer prévia deste item
Checando...

The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest

Autor: John Timothy Jacobs; John Ferns
Editora: ©2003.
Dissertação: Thesis (Ph. D.)--McMaster University, 2003.
Edição/Formato   Tese/dissertação : Tese/dissertação : Manuscrito   Material de Arquivo : InglêsVer todas as edições e formatos
Base de Dados:WorldCat
Resumo:
There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges.  Ler mais...
Classificação:

(ainda não classificado) 0 com críticas - Seja o primeiro.

Assuntos
Mais como este

 

Encontrar uma cópia on-line

Links para este item

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que possuem este item...

Detalhes

Pessoa Denominada: David Foster Wallace; David Foster Wallace; Gerard Manley Hopkins; Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Tipo de Material: Tese/dissertação, Manuscrito, Recurso Internet
Tipo de Documento: Livro, Material de Arquivo, Recurso Internet
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: John Timothy Jacobs; John Ferns
Número OCLC: 181810287
Notas: Advisor: John Ferns.
Descrição: vii, 241 leaves ; 28 cm
Responsabilidade: by John Timothy Jacobs.
Mais informações:

Resumo:

There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges. David Foster Wallace's <italic>Infinite Jest</italic> (1996) represents these challenges, and much more; it is at once an encyclopedic novel of 1079 pages, full of both liberal arts and scientific erudition, and an encomium to an apocalyptic end of late millennial American culture. The novel is highly allegorical and operates with three crucial subtexts, in addition to the standard diegetic narrative. In this study, I present three different, though not mutually exclusive, interpretations of this novel, a novel that has presented interpretive difficulties to scholars of contemporary fiction. In Part One, I survey and compare Wallace's aesthetic with the radical, yet self-contained, aesthetic of the poet, G.M. Hopkins; Part Two examines the integral concept of mediation and explores the subtext of the return of the dead author & mdash;the novel operates, in part, as a rejoinder to the death-of-the-author critical impasse; Part Three is primarily comparative and analyzes Fyodor Dostoevsky's <italic>The Brothers Karamazov</italic> (1880). Wallace has rewritten (or reimagined) Dostoevsky's novel and translated it into a contemporary context and idiom as a remedy for postmodern American solipsism.

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários
Recuperando críticas GoodReas...
Recuperando comentários DOGObooks

Etiquetas

Seja o primeiro.
Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Dados Ligados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/181810287>
library:oclcnum"181810287"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/181810287>
rdf:typej.1:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1356765>
rdf:typeschema:CreativeWork
schema:name"Bratʹi︠a︡ Karamazovy (Dostoyevsky, Fyodor)"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2003"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2003"
schema:description"There is an inherent risk in studying contemporary fiction. Serious questions form around issues of an author's longevity and legacy, a work's merit and its endurance for later scholarship, and the varieties of current critical reception and methodology against the shifts to come. The attendant difficulty of assessing and analyzing a work before an industry of critical reception has formed also presents challenges. David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest (1996) represents these challenges, and much more; it is at once an encyclopedic novel of 1079 pages, full of both liberal arts and scientific erudition, and an encomium to an apocalyptic end of late millennial American culture. The novel is highly allegorical and operates with three crucial subtexts, in addition to the standard diegetic narrative. In this study, I present three different, though not mutually exclusive, interpretations of this novel, a novel that has presented interpretive difficulties to scholars of contemporary fiction. In Part One, I survey and compare Wallace's aesthetic with the radical, yet self-contained, aesthetic of the poet, G.M. Hopkins; Part Two examines the integral concept of mediation and explores the subtext of the return of the dead author & mdash;the novel operates, in part, as a rejoinder to the death-of-the-author critical impasse; Part Three is primarily comparative and analyzes Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov (1880). Wallace has rewritten (or reimagined) Dostoevsky's novel and translated it into a contemporary context and idiom as a remedy for postmodern American solipsism."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/500093829>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The eschatological imagination : mediating David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest"@en
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.