컨텐츠로 이동
Essays on Authority 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

Essays on Authority

저자: Michael Allen Sevel
출판사: [Austin, Tex. : University of Texas, 2010]
논문: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2010.
판/형식:   주제/주장 : 문서 : 눈문/학위논문 : 주 또는 도 정부 간행물 : 전자도서   컴퓨터 파일 : 영어
데이터베이스:WorldCat
요약:
The chapters contained in this dissertation are three essays on the nature of practical authority, and the role it plays in the thought and action of those subject to it. In chapter 1, I criticize a recent and influential philosophical theory of authority, Joseph Raz's service conception, and argue that it is inadequate because it does not recognize that authority thwarts an obedient subject's ability to express her  더 읽기…
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

 

온라인으로 문서 찾기

이 항목에 대한 링크

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

자료 유형: 문서, 눈문/학위논문, 정부 간행물, 주 또는 도 정부 간행물, 인터넷 자료
문서 형식: 인터넷 자원, 컴퓨터 파일
모든 저자 / 참여자: Michael Allen Sevel
OCLC 번호: 682947826
메모: Title from PDF title page (University of Texas Digital Repository, viewed on Nov. 23, 2010).
Vita.
설명: 1 online resource (xi, 203 leaves).
책임: by Michael Allen Sevel.

초록:

The chapters contained in this dissertation are three essays on the nature of practical authority, and the role it plays in the thought and action of those subject to it. In chapter 1, I criticize a recent and influential philosophical theory of authority, Joseph Raz's service conception, and argue that it is inadequate because it does not recognize that authority thwarts an obedient subject's ability to express her personality and character traits in action. In chapter 2, I argue that, in cases of personal authority, the issuing of a command involves the authority supplying the content of an intention to act to the subject, and that this breaks down the self-other asymmetries which theorists of self-knowledge have assumed exist with respect to the 'privileged access' one is said to have to one's own mind. In chapter 3, I argue that in cases of both personal and non-personal (e.g., institutional) authority, there is a further problem in exercising and obeying authority which has gone unrecognized. I draw on recent work in social psychology to show that authoritative directives fix a subject's understanding of her own actions across time and thus thwart the otherwise dynamic process of the development of the subject's self-conception. I show that these arguments constitute a new burden in justifying authority and therefore revive the anarchist objection that authority and autonomy are conceptually incompatible.

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

첫번째 되기
요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

링크된 데이터


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/682947826>
library:oclcnum"682947826"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/682947826>
rdf:typej.2:Web_document
rdf:typej.2:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:description"The chapters contained in this dissertation are three essays on the nature of practical authority, and the role it plays in the thought and action of those subject to it. In chapter 1, I criticize a recent and influential philosophical theory of authority, Joseph Raz's service conception, and argue that it is inadequate because it does not recognize that authority thwarts an obedient subject's ability to express her personality and character traits in action. In chapter 2, I argue that, in cases of personal authority, the issuing of a command involves the authority supplying the content of an intention to act to the subject, and that this breaks down the self-other asymmetries which theorists of self-knowledge have assumed exist with respect to the 'privileged access' one is said to have to one's own mind. In chapter 3, I argue that in cases of both personal and non-personal (e.g., institutional) authority, there is a further problem in exercising and obeying authority which has gone unrecognized. I draw on recent work in social psychology to show that authoritative directives fix a subject's understanding of her own actions across time and thus thwart the otherwise dynamic process of the development of the subject's self-conception. I show that these arguments constitute a new burden in justifying authority and therefore revive the anarchist objection that authority and autonomy are conceptually incompatible."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/760780474>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Essays on Authority"
schema:publisher
schema:url<https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2010-08-1920/SEVEL-DISSERTATION.pdf>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.