skip to content
Ethnic Vistas : Minorities, the Environment, and the Welfare State Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Ethnic Vistas : Minorities, the Environment, and the Welfare State

Author: Janice Tanemura
Publisher: Berkeley, CA, 2010.
Dissertation: Thesis (Ph.D. in English)--University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
Edition/Format:   Thesis/dissertation : Document : Thesis/dissertation : eBook   Computer File : English
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
This dissertation examines the relationship between race and the environment through three intersecting critical lenses: literature, environmental criticism, and political theory. While minority discourse has traditionally been defined by the experience of negation, I argue that as power becomes increasingly progressive and globalized in the twentieth century, there is a need to revise our geopolitical understanding  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Genre/Form: Dissertations, Academic
Material Type: Document, Thesis/dissertation, Internet resource
Document Type: Internet Resource, Computer File
All Authors / Contributors: Janice Tanemura
OCLC Number: 839217375
Description: 1 online resource (188 leaves.)
Responsibility: Janice Tanemura.

Abstract:

This dissertation examines the relationship between race and the environment through three intersecting critical lenses: literature, environmental criticism, and political theory. While minority discourse has traditionally been defined by the experience of negation, I argue that as power becomes increasingly progressive and globalized in the twentieth century, there is a need to revise our geopolitical understanding of racial scapegoating and racial stereotyping. Due to the popularity of the model minority thesis that defined Japanese American exceptionalism against African American delinquency, I focus on a comparative analysis of African American and Japanese American literature that engages the technique of cognitive mapping in order to represent the function of racial minorities in relation to the expansion of the welfare state. Using Michel Foucault's concept of biopolitics as a theoretical framework, I examine how positive and negative racial stereotypes circulated in cultural discourse concerning the future of liberal democracy in the twentieth century. I argue that racial minorities have often functioned to manage the tension within liberal democracy, or the conflict between the centrifugal force of liberal individualism and the centripetal force of democratic communitarianism. Japanese Americans and African Americans have historically been positioned ambiguously as both internal and external to the state, and objectified and subjectified by liberal capitalism. My analysis of what I call minority environmental discourse brings into relief a new critique of the state that differs from traditional right and left critiques that both imagine the state as a threat to civil society; it is not that the state is either enabling or disciplinary, but that it fails to protect and manage the productive potential within marginalized populations. Excavating the point of view of marginalized populations, minority environmental discourse brings into view "fall out" experiences that suggest how the experiences of minorities significantly render visible a critique of the limits within biopolitics, or control that is enforced through what Foucault calls the "optimization of life" that is achieved through passive environmental controls. I examine the aesthetic forms and forms of personhood that are imagined through minority literature's cognitive mapping of the environment as being invested with both energies for resistance to and participation within a globalized progressive social totality.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/839217375>
bgn:inSupportOf"Thesis (Ph.D. in English)--University of California, Berkeley, 2010."
library:oclcnum"839217375"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typebgn:Thesis
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typej.0:Web_document
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:valueUnknown value: deg
rdf:valueUnknown value: dct
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/265988400>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"University of California, Berkeley. Department of English."
schema:name"University of California, Berkeley. Department of English"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:description"This dissertation examines the relationship between race and the environment through three intersecting critical lenses: literature, environmental criticism, and political theory. While minority discourse has traditionally been defined by the experience of negation, I argue that as power becomes increasingly progressive and globalized in the twentieth century, there is a need to revise our geopolitical understanding of racial scapegoating and racial stereotyping. Due to the popularity of the model minority thesis that defined Japanese American exceptionalism against African American delinquency, I focus on a comparative analysis of African American and Japanese American literature that engages the technique of cognitive mapping in order to represent the function of racial minorities in relation to the expansion of the welfare state. Using Michel Foucault's concept of biopolitics as a theoretical framework, I examine how positive and negative racial stereotypes circulated in cultural discourse concerning the future of liberal democracy in the twentieth century. I argue that racial minorities have often functioned to manage the tension within liberal democracy, or the conflict between the centrifugal force of liberal individualism and the centripetal force of democratic communitarianism. Japanese Americans and African Americans have historically been positioned ambiguously as both internal and external to the state, and objectified and subjectified by liberal capitalism. My analysis of what I call minority environmental discourse brings into relief a new critique of the state that differs from traditional right and left critiques that both imagine the state as a threat to civil society; it is not that the state is either enabling or disciplinary, but that it fails to protect and manage the productive potential within marginalized populations. Excavating the point of view of marginalized populations, minority environmental discourse brings into view "fall out" experiences that suggest how the experiences of minorities significantly render visible a critique of the limits within biopolitics, or control that is enforced through what Foucault calls the "optimization of life" that is achieved through passive environmental controls. I examine the aesthetic forms and forms of personhood that are imagined through minority literature's cognitive mapping of the environment as being invested with both energies for resistance to and participation within a globalized progressive social totality."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1232554372>
schema:genre"Dissertations, Academic"@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Ethnic Vistas : Minorities, the Environment, and the Welfare State"@en
schema:publication
schema:url<http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/etd/ucb/text/Tanemura_berkeley_0028E_10777.pdf>
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.