skip to content
Evaluation of options for CO₂ capture Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Evaluation of options for CO₂ capture

Author: Doctor, R.D.; Schmalzer, D.K.; Argonne National Lab.; United States. Department of Energy.; National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.); United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Publisher: Washington, D.C. : United States. Dept. of Energy ; Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 1995.
Edition/Format:   eBook : Document : Conference publication : National government publication : English
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
The project objective is to develop engineering evaluations of technologies for the capture, use, and disposal of carbon dioxide (CO₂). This project emphasizes CO₂-capture technologies combined with integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power systems. Commercially available CO₂-capture technology is providing a performance and economic baseline against which to compare innovative technologies. The intent is  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Material Type: Conference publication, Document, Government publication, National government publication, Internet resource
Document Type: Internet Resource, Computer File
All Authors / Contributors: Doctor, R.D.; Schmalzer, D.K.; Argonne National Lab.; United States. Department of Energy.; National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.); United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
OCLC Number: 68353490
Notes: Published through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information.
11/01/1995.
"Doe/mc/29220--96/c0551."
"Conf-9506162--35."
"DE96002108."
Advanced coal-fired power systems '95 review meeting, Morgantown, WV (United States), 27-29 Jun 1995.
Doctor, R.D.; Schmalzer, D.K.
Description: 3 pages : digital, PDF file.
Responsibility: utilization/disposal.

Abstract:

The project objective is to develop engineering evaluations of technologies for the capture, use, and disposal of carbon dioxide (CO₂). This project emphasizes CO₂-capture technologies combined with integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power systems. Commercially available CO₂-capture technology is providing a performance and economic baseline against which to compare innovative technologies. The intent is to provide the CO₂ budget, or an {open_quotes}equivalent CO₂{close_quotes} budget associated with each of the individual energy-cycle steps in addition to process design capital and operating costs. The value used for the {open_quotes}equivalent CO₂{close_quotes} budget is 1 kg CO₂/kWhe. The base case is a 458-MW (Gross) IGCC system using an O₂-blown Kellogg-Rust-Westinghouse (KRW) agglomerating fluidized bed gasifier, Illinois No. 6 bituminous coal feed and low-pressure glycol sulfur removal followed by a Claus/SCOT treatment to produce a salable product. Mining, feed preparation and conversion result in a net electric power production for the entire energy cycle of 411-MW with a 0.801 kg/kWhe CO₂ release rate. For comparison, the gasifier output was taken through water-gas shift and then to either low-pressure glycol or chilled methanol for H₂S recovery; low-pressure glycol or membranes for CO₂ recovery; and finally either a combustion turbine or fuel cell as the topping cycle. CO₂ recovery was set at 80% for all cases so that the membrane system could be compared with the glycol on a consistent basis. The combustion turbine was then fed a high hydrogen content fuel. From the IGCC plant, a 500-km pipeline took the CO₂ to geological sequestering. For the optimal case, the net electric power projection was reduced by 73-MW with a 0.277-kg/kWhe CO₂, release rate (when make-up power was considered).

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/68353490>
library:oclcnum"68353490"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:valueUnknown value: gpb
rdf:valueUnknown value: dct
rdf:valueUnknown value: cnp
rdf:valueUnknown value: ngp
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:author
schema:author
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
<http://viaf.org/viaf/169107706>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.)"
schema:datePublished"1995"
schema:description"The project objective is to develop engineering evaluations of technologies for the capture, use, and disposal of carbon dioxide (CO₂). This project emphasizes CO₂-capture technologies combined with integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power systems. Commercially available CO₂-capture technology is providing a performance and economic baseline against which to compare innovative technologies. The intent is to provide the CO₂ budget, or an {open_quotes}equivalent CO₂{close_quotes} budget associated with each of the individual energy-cycle steps in addition to process design capital and operating costs. The value used for the {open_quotes}equivalent CO₂{close_quotes} budget is 1 kg CO₂/kWhe. The base case is a 458-MW (Gross) IGCC system using an O₂-blown Kellogg-Rust-Westinghouse (KRW) agglomerating fluidized bed gasifier, Illinois No. 6 bituminous coal feed and low-pressure glycol sulfur removal followed by a Claus/SCOT treatment to produce a salable product. Mining, feed preparation and conversion result in a net electric power production for the entire energy cycle of 411-MW with a 0.801 kg/kWhe CO₂ release rate. For comparison, the gasifier output was taken through water-gas shift and then to either low-pressure glycol or chilled methanol for H₂S recovery; low-pressure glycol or membranes for CO₂ recovery; and finally either a combustion turbine or fuel cell as the topping cycle. CO₂ recovery was set at 80% for all cases so that the membrane system could be compared with the glycol on a consistent basis. The combustion turbine was then fed a high hydrogen content fuel. From the IGCC plant, a 500-km pipeline took the CO₂ to geological sequestering. For the optimal case, the net electric power projection was reduced by 73-MW with a 0.277-kg/kWhe CO₂, release rate (when make-up power was considered)."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1911105291>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Evaluation of options for CO₂ capture"@en
schema:publication
<http://www.worldcat.org/title/-/oclc/68353490#PublicationEvent/washington_d_c_united_states_dept_of_energy_oak_ridge_tenn_distributed_by_the_office_of_scientific_and_technical_information_u_s_dept_of_energy_1995>
rdf:typeschema:PublicationEvent
schema:location
schema:location
schema:organizer
schema:organizer
schema:startDate"1995"
schema:publisher
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/125371-xKmAjg/webviewable/>
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.