|提及的人：||John Kenneth Galbraith; Paul R Krugman|
Alan Duhs; University of Queensland. School of Economics.
|注意：||Title from title screen (viewed on 13 May 2010)
|詳述：||System requirements: Adobe Acrobat reader for viewing PDF files.; Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. Available at: http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/abstract/369.pdf.|
|叢書名：||PANDORA electronic collection.; Discussion papers (University of Queensland. School of Economics), no. 369.|
"J.K. Galbraith's heyday was in the 1950s-70s. He was one of the most cited economists of his time, and attracted much praise and blame. In 1994, Krugman was a caustic critic and dismissed Galbraith's influence as a victory of style over substance. He castigated Galbraith as but "a policy entrepreneur", yet by 2004, Krugman appeared to have undergone a striking metamorphosis, and his New York Times columns (2000-2006) conspicuously echo Galbraith's understanding of socio-economic issues. This newer Krugman questions consumer sovereignty, bemoans the power of producers, questions the uses to which State power is put, worries about a medical-industrial complex, and laments the hijacking of public policy by private interests. Is this new Krugman merely a journalist, who has left scientific economics behind, or has he 'seen the light' as to what really constitutes 'good economics' and a more holistic scientific procedure?"--Abstract.