• 引证/输出
  引证/输出

  复制引证文献

  APA（第6版）

  

  芝加哥（著者-日期，第15版）

  

  Harvard（第18版）

  

  MLA（第7版）

  

  Turabian（第6版）

  

  输出引证文献

  输出到RefWorks   输出到EndNote / 参考管理（Reference Manager）   输出到EasyBib   删除

  请注意： 这些引证文献都以参考咨询的标準為基础。但是，处理格式的规则，在应用程序、感兴趣或研究的领域之间会大相径庭。应当考虑到负责復审的出版商、上课的教师、机构或者组织的具体要求或者优先选择。
• 打印
• 电子邮件
  电子邮件

  所有的字段都要。

  电邮地址字段是一定要有的。请输入收件人的电子邮件地址。

  输入的电邮地址格式不对。请重新输入收件人的电邮地址。

  最多可将资料送给五个收件人。

  输入收件人的电子邮件地址： 最多能用逗号（,）将五个地址分开

  名字的字段是一定要有的。请输入您的名字。

  输入你的名字： 主题的字段是一定要有的。请输入主题。 主题:

  电子邮件讯息的字段是一定要有的。请输入讯息。

  电子邮件： 我想你可能会对这资料感兴趣，资料位于 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/423734521 题名： From the closet to the courtroom : five LGBT rights lawsuits that have changed our nation 著者： Carlos A Ball 出版商： Boston : Beacon Press, ©2010. ISBN/ISSN: 9780807000786 0807000787 OCLC:423734521

  
  

  输入的ReCaptcha词条不对。要设法和显示在窗口中的那两个字一样，也可试用音频版。

  删除
• 共享
• 永久链接
  永久链接

  复制URL以便和网页链接：

• 撰写评论
• 评估这资料：
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

更多类似这样的

主题

• Gay rights -- United States -- Digests.
• Homosexuality -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Digests.
• Discrimination -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Digests.
• 查看所有主题

用户列表

相似资料

From the closet to the courtroom : five LGBT rights lawsuits that have changed our nation

著者：	Carlos A Ball
出版商：	Boston : Beacon Press, ©2010.
丛书：	Queer action/queer ideas.
版本/格式：	图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要：	The author describes five lawsuits that have helped change the way lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) people are treated in the United States. The cases are Braschi v. Stahl Associates, in which an appellate court recognize that two men can constitute a family; Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996), in which a Wisconsin jury recognized that a bullied gay teenager had had his constitutional rights violated by school officials who looked the other way; Rome v. Evans, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to deny LGBT people the opportunity to seek antidiscrimination protection under the law; Baehr v. Lewin (1993), in which the Hawaii Supreme Court questioned the constitutionality of denying same-sex couples the right to marry; and Lawrence v. Texas (2003), in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government cannot criminalize private and consensual gay sex. For each case, he offers a description of the facts involved, a discussion of the legal issues involved and how they were dealt with in the litigation, and an analysis of the legal and social impact of the case.  再读一些...
评估：	(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。