skip to content
Funding ammunition ports Preview this item
ClosePreview this item

Funding ammunition ports

Author: Edward G Keating; Daniel Sommerhauser; United States. Army.; Arroyo Center.
Publisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2012.
Series: Technical report (Rand Corporation), TR-1204-A.
Edition/Format:   Print book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
The U.S. Army{u2019}s two ammunition ports{u2014}Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) and Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point (MOTSU){u2014}have different funding approaches and accounting systems, and a central question in this research is what the most appropriate financial structure should be. Would consolidation to a single approach be desirable? To help answer this question, the authors develop two  Read more...
Getting this item's online copy... Getting this item's online copy...

Find a copy in the library

Getting this item's location and availability... Getting this item's location and availability...

WorldCat

Find it in libraries globally
Worldwide libraries own this item

Details

Material Type: Internet resource
Document Type: Book, Internet Resource
All Authors / Contributors: Edward G Keating; Daniel Sommerhauser; United States. Army.; Arroyo Center.
ISBN: 9780833060389 0833060384
OCLC Number: 792889858
Notes: "Prepared for the United States Army."
"Arroyo Center."
Description: xix, 34 pages : color illustrations, color charts ; 28 cm.
Contents: Introduction --
MOTCO{u2019}s and MOTSU{u2019}s Workload and Finances --
Prospective Port Funding Arrangements {u2013} Conclusions {u2013} Appendix: An Overview of Defense Working Capital Funds.
Series Title: Technical report (Rand Corporation), TR-1204-A.
Responsibility: Edward G. Keating, Daniel Sommerhauser.

Abstract:

The U.S. Army{u2019}s two ammunition ports{u2014}Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) and Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point (MOTSU){u2014}have different funding approaches and accounting systems, and a central question in this research is what the most appropriate financial structure should be. Would consolidation to a single approach be desirable? To help answer this question, the authors develop two variations of an ammunition port funding policy. To do so, they interviewed subject matter experts, reviewed the literature on working capital fund pricing policies, and examined Department of Defense financial regulations. They developed several criteria to help in their evaluation: The funding mechanism should encourage efficient use of the ports; funding should not vary sharply over time; the funding mechanism should use existing or easily obtained financial data as much as possible; and the other military services should pay for their use of the ports. The authors{u2019} proposed variations have customers facing marginal costs when deciding how much workload to put through a port. Efficiency is enhanced when customers make decisions based on marginal, not average, costs. However, a key mitigating characteristic for ammunition ports is the apparently limited price elasticity of demand for the ports{u2019} services. When customers have greater demand elasticity, pricing decisions and hence the chosen funding approach are of greater importance.
Retrieving notes about this item Retrieving notes about this item

Reviews

User-contributed reviews

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.