přejít na obsah
Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio

Autor Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Vydavatel: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, ©2011.
Edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
Vydání/formát:   e-kniha : Document : EnglishZobrazit všechny vydání a formáty
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Najít online exemplář

Odkazy na tento dokument

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Typ materiálu: Document, Internetový zdroj
Typ dokumentu: Internet Resource, Computer File
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC číslo: 719368883
Poznámky: "April 2011."
Title from http://www.nber.org/papers/16980 viewed May 2, 2011.
Popis: 1 online resource (69 p.) : ill.
Název edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
Odpovědnost: Joshua Gans, Fiona E. Murray.

Anotace:

This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.

Podobné dokumenty

Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/719368883>
library:oclcnum"719368883"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/719368883>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Disclosure of information"@en
schema:name"Disclosure of information."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095198>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Government policy"@en
schema:name"Research--Government policy."@en
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/894288894>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Funding scientific knowledge selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w16980>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.