aller au contenu
Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio Aperçu de cet ouvrage
FermerAperçu de cet ouvrage
Vérifiant…

Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio

Auteur : Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Éditeur : Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, ©2011.
Collection : Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
Édition/format :   Livre électronique : Document : AnglaisVoir toutes les éditions et les formats
Base de données :WorldCat
Résumé :
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our  Lire la suite...
Évaluation :

(pas encore évalué) 0 avec des critiques - Soyez le premier.

Sujets
Plus comme ceci

 

Trouver un exemplaire en ligne

Liens vers cet ouvrage

Trouver un exemplaire dans la bibliothèque

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Recherche de bibliothèques qui possèdent cet ouvrage...

Détails

Type d’ouvrage : Document, Ressource Internet
Format : Ressource Internet, Fichier informatique
Tous les auteurs / collaborateurs : Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Numéro OCLC : 719368883
Notes : "April 2011."
Title from http://www.nber.org/papers/16980 viewed May 2, 2011.
Description : 1 online resource (69 p.) : ill.
Titre de collection : Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
Responsabilité : Joshua Gans, Fiona E. Murray.

Résumé :

This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed.

Critiques

Critiques d’utilisateurs
Récupération des critiques de GoodReads...
Récuperation des critiques DOGObooks…

Tags

Soyez le premier.
Confirmez cette demande

Vous avez peut-être déjà demandé cet ouvrage. Veuillez sélectionner OK si vous voulez poursuivre avec cette demande quand même.

Données liées


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/719368883>
library:oclcnum"719368883"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/719368883>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Disclosure of information"@en
schema:name"Disclosure of information."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095198>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Government policy"@en
schema:name"Research--Government policy."@en
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/894288894>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Funding scientific knowledge selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w16980>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Fermer la fenêtre

Veuillez vous identifier dans WorldCat 

Vous n’avez pas de compte? Vous pouvez facilement créer un compte gratuit.