컨텐츠로 이동
Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio

저자: Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
출판사: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, ©2011.
시리즈: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
판/형식:   전자도서 : 문서 : 영어모든 판과 형식 보기
데이터베이스:WorldCat
요약:
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our  더 읽기…
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

 

온라인으로 문서 찾기

이 항목에 대한 링크

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

자료 유형: 문서, 인터넷 자료
문서 형식: 인터넷 자원, 컴퓨터 파일
모든 저자 / 참여자: Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC 번호: 719368883
메모: "April 2011."
Title from http://www.nber.org/papers/16980 viewed May 2, 2011.
설명: 1 online resource (69 p.) : ill.
일련 제목: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
책임: Joshua Gans, Fiona E. Murray.

초록:

This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed.

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

첫번째 되기
요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

링크된 데이터


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/719368883>
library:oclcnum"719368883"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/719368883>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Disclosure of information"@en
schema:name"Disclosure of information."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095198>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Government policy"@en
schema:name"Research--Government policy."@en
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/894288894>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Funding scientific knowledge selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w16980>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.