跳到内容
Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio 预览资料
关闭预览资料
正在查...

Funding scientific knowledge : selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio

著者: Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
出版商: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, ©2011.
丛书: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
版本/格式:   电子图书 : 文献 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
数据库:WorldCat
提要:
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our  再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

主题
更多类似这样的

 

在线查找

在图书馆查找

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

材料类型: 文献, 互联网资源
文件类型: 互联网资源, 计算机文档
所有的著者/提供者: Joshua Gans; Fiona E S Murray; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC号码: 719368883
注意: "April 2011."
Title from http://www.nber.org/papers/16980 viewed May 2, 2011.
描述: 1 online resource (69 p.) : ill.
丛书名: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 16980.
责任: Joshua Gans, Fiona E. Murray.

摘要:

This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索DOGObooks的评论

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

链接数据


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/719368883>
library:oclcnum"719368883"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/719368883>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894870>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Disclosure of information"@en
schema:name"Disclosure of information."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1095198>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Research--Government policy"@en
schema:name"Research--Government policy."@en
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research -- filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem -- in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/894288894>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Funding scientific knowledge selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w16980>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.