컨텐츠로 이동
The geopolitics of intervention : Asia and the responsibility to protect 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

The geopolitics of intervention : Asia and the responsibility to protect

저자: Yang Razali Kassim
출판사: Singapore, SG Springer [2014] ©2014
시리즈: SpringerBriefs in political science.
판/형식:   전자도서 : 문서 : 영어모든 판과 형식 보기
데이터베이스:WorldCat
요약:
This book reviews the global dilemma and tensions over whether to intervene or not to intervene in severe civil conflicts which test the validity of the new doctrine of Responsibility to Protect or R2P. It particularly assesses R2P's relevance for Asia, which is defined broadly in this book to include West Asia or the Middle East and the region's emergence as the most severe threat to international order in the form  더 읽기…
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

 

온라인으로 문서 찾기

이 항목에 대한 링크

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

장르/형태: Electronic books
추가적인 물리적 형식: Print version:
Yang Razali Kassim.
Geopolitics of intervention
(OCoLC)873476433
자료 유형: 문서, 인터넷 자료
문서 형식: 인터넷 자원, 컴퓨터 파일
모든 저자 / 참여자: Yang Razali Kassim
ISBN: 9789814585484 9814585483 9814585475 9789814585477
OCLC 번호: 873860506
설명: 1 online resource (90 pages)
내용: Preamble --
Chapter1 The Rise of Responsibility While Protecting (RWP) --
Chapter2The Arab Spring and the P5 Powers --
Chapter 3 China as a P5 Player --
Chapter4 China, India, Japan and the emerging Eastphalian Order? --
Chapter 5 ASEAN and R2P --
Chapter 6Critiques and Critics of R2P --
Chapter7 Geopolitics of Intervention: Way Forward --
Chapter 8 Postscript.
일련 제목: SpringerBriefs in political science.
책임: Yang Razali Kassim.

초록:

This book reviews the global dilemma and tensions over whether to intervene or not to intervene in severe civil conflicts which test the validity of the new doctrine of Responsibility to Protect or R2P. It particularly assesses R2P's relevance for Asia, which is defined broadly in this book to include West Asia or the Middle East and the region's emergence as the most severe threat to international order in the form of the Arab Uprisings. While East Asia and South Asia have their share of situations that warrant R2P-justified interventions, it is the conflicts in West Asia that have severely tested the viability of R2P. Has this new norm been effective as a tool for international law and diplomacy? Are there prospects for a tweaking or repositioning of R2P as advocated by some scholars and governments to make the concept more acceptable to the global community, including Southeast Asia? Has the Westphalian doctrine of state sovereignty and non-intervention become superfluous as a result of the rise of R2P? Will a new doctrine of 'Eastphalia' or 'non-intervention with East Asian characteristics' emerge in its place, led by China as well as like-minded Asian and other states?

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

첫번째 되기
요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

링크된 데이터


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/873860506>
library:oclcnum"873860506"
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:valueUnknown value: dct
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2014"
schema:description"This book reviews the global dilemma and tensions over whether to intervene or not to intervene in severe civil conflicts which test the validity of the new doctrine of Responsibility to Protect or R2P. It particularly assesses R2P's relevance for Asia, which is defined broadly in this book to include West Asia or the Middle East and the region's emergence as the most severe threat to international order in the form of the Arab Uprisings. While East Asia and South Asia have their share of situations that warrant R2P-justified interventions, it is the conflicts in West Asia that have severely tested the viability of R2P. Has this new norm been effective as a tool for international law and diplomacy? Are there prospects for a tweaking or repositioning of R2P as advocated by some scholars and governments to make the concept more acceptable to the global community, including Southeast Asia? Has the Westphalian doctrine of state sovereignty and non-intervention become superfluous as a result of the rise of R2P? Will a new doctrine of 'Eastphalia' or 'non-intervention with East Asian characteristics' emerge in its place, led by China as well as like-minded Asian and other states?"@en
schema:description"Preamble -- Chapter1 The Rise of Responsibility While Protecting (RWP) -- Chapter2The Arab Spring and the P5 Powers -- Chapter 3 China as a P5 Player -- Chapter4 China, India, Japan and the emerging Eastphalian Order? -- Chapter 5 ASEAN and R2P -- Chapter 6Critiques and Critics of R2P -- Chapter7 Geopolitics of Intervention: Way Forward -- Chapter 8 Postscript."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1843101823>
schema:genre"Electronic books"@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"The geopolitics of intervention : Asia and the responsibility to protect"@en
schema:url
schema:url<http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=710591>
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.