Find a copy online
Links to this item
Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
|Named Person:||Charles Goodyear; Horace H Day|
|Material Type:||Document, Internet resource|
|Document Type:||Internet Resource, Computer File|
|All Authors / Contributors:||
Horace H Day; Charles Goodyear; Abraham Payne; James T Brady; United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents.
|Notes:||Reproduction of the original from the New York City Bar.|
|Description:||1 online resource (66, 8, 30 p.) : charts.|
|Contents:||pt. 1. Argument of Horace H. Day, late India rubber manufacturer, before Committee on Patents, in Congress of the United States, April 22, 1864, against the extension of Goodyear patent for vulcanized rubber, showing Goodyear was not the inventor, and who was, showing the means adopted to obtain Judge Greir's decision creating the rubber monopoly, June, 1852, and also Goodyear receipts of|
|Series Title:||Making of Modern Law : Trials, 1600-1926.|
|Other Titles:||Before Committee on patents, in House of Representatives, March, 1864 : in the matter of the application to Congress for extension of Goodyear rubber patent of June 14, 1844.
Before the Congress of the United States in the matter of the application for the extension of the Goodyear vulcanizing patent of June 15, 1844.
Extension of Goodyear's patent.