skip to content
The harm in hate speech Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

The harm in hate speech

Author: Jeremy Waldron
Publisher: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2012.
Series: The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 2009
Edition/Format:   Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
Every liberal democracy has laws or codes against hate speech, except the United States. For constitutionalists, regulation of hate speech violates the First Amendment and damages a free society. Against this absolutist view, the author argues that hate speech should be regulated as part of our commitment to human dignity and to inclusion and respect for members of vulnerable minorities. Causing offense, by  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Genre/Form: Análisis
Material Type: Internet resource
Document Type: Book, Internet Resource
All Authors / Contributors: Jeremy Waldron
ISBN: 9780674065895 0674065891
OCLC Number: 758383685
Description: vi, 292 pages ; 21 cm.
Contents: Approaching hate speech --
Anthony Lewis's Freedom for the Thought That we Hate --
Why call hate speech group libel? --
The appearance of hate --
Protecting dignity or protection from offense? --
C. Edwin Baker and the autonomy argument --
Ronald Dworkin and the legitimacy argument --
Toleration and calumny.
Series Title: The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 2009
Responsibility: Jeremy Waldron.
More information:

Abstract:

For constitutionalists, regulation of hate speech violates the First Amendment and damages a free society. Waldron rejects this view, and makes the case that hate speech should be regulated as part  Read more...

Reviews

Editorial reviews

Publisher Synopsis

A vigorously argued, intelligent challenge to the "liberal bravado" of U.S. First Amendment scholars. In an eloquent reply to free-speech advocates, Waldron moves step by step in building the Read more...

 
User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/758383685>
library:oclcnum"758383685"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/758383685>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/934052>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Freedom of speech--Philosophy"@en
schema:name"Freedom of speech--Philosophy."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2012"
schema:description"Approaching hate speech -- Anthony Lewis's Freedom for the Thought That we Hate -- Why call hate speech group libel? -- The appearance of hate -- Protecting dignity or protection from offense? -- C. Edwin Baker and the autonomy argument -- Ronald Dworkin and the legitimacy argument -- Toleration and calumny."@en
schema:description"Every liberal democracy has laws or codes against hate speech, except the United States. For constitutionalists, regulation of hate speech violates the First Amendment and damages a free society. Against this absolutist view, the author argues that hate speech should be regulated as part of our commitment to human dignity and to inclusion and respect for members of vulnerable minorities. Causing offense, by depicting a religious leader as a terrorist in a newspaper cartoon, for example, is not the same as launching a libelous attack on a group's dignity, according to the author, and it lies outside the reach of law. But defamation of a minority group, through hate speech, undermines a public good that can and should be protected: the basic assurance of inclusion in society for all members. A social environment polluted by anti-gay leaflets, Nazi banners, and burning crosses sends an implicit message to the targets of such hatred: your security is uncertain and you can expect to face humiliation and discrimination when you leave your home. Free-speech advocates boast of despising what racists say but defending to the death their right to say it. The author finds this emphasis on intellectual resilience misguided and points instead to the threat hate speech poses to the lives, dignity, and reputations of minority members. Finding support for his view among philosophers of the Enlightenment, he asks us to move beyond knee-jerk American exceptionalism in our debates over the serious consequences of hateful speech."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1065944956>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The harm in hate speech"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.