Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
| Genre/Form: | Popular works |
|---|---|
| Document Type: | Book |
| All Authors / Contributors: |
B Greene |
| ISBN: | 9780307265630 0307265633 |
| OCLC Number: | 607975732 |
| Notes: | "This is a Borzoi book"--T.p. verso. |
| Description: | xi, 370 p. : ill. ; 25 cm. |
| Contents: | The bounds of reality: on parallel worlds -- Endless doppelgangers: the quilted multiverse -- Eternity and infinity: the inflationary multiverse -- Unifying nature's laws: on the road to string theory -- Hovering universes in nearby dimensions: the brane and cyclic multiverses -- New thinking about an old constant: the landscape multiverse -- Science and the multiverse: on inference, explanation, and prediction -- The many worlds of quantum measurement: the quantum multiverse -- Black holes and holograms: the holographic multiverse -- Universes, computers, and mathematical reality: the simulated and ultimate multiverses -- The limits of inquiry: multiverses and the future. |
| Responsibility: | Brian Greene. |
Abstract:
Reviews
WorldCat User Reviews (1)
Manifest make believe
I enjoyed this generally well written book even though it has a couple of major shortcomings. I liked that it made some effort to back up claims about mathematics with some details, but this turned out to be more of the same tease rather than minimally adequate explication. At the very...
Read more...
I enjoyed this generally well written book even though it has a couple of major shortcomings. I liked that it made some effort to back up claims about mathematics with some details, but this turned out to be more of the same tease rather than minimally adequate explication. At the very least every symbol, term, and math operation should be fully defined. It would be even better to explain what the equations actually capture, term-by-term, operation by operation. I can't think of anyone more capable to doing this than Greene.
The second major problem is that the entire effort tends to undermine faith in what seems to be solid about physics. For example, all the practical stuff known about light (photons) and electrons (electronics, electricity) tends to get undermined by the uncertainties of the standard model of particle physics and which way is (ways are) more intuitive to think about quantum states and jumps. I fully realize that Greene is attempting to bring non-specialists to the cutting edge, which is fine, but he risks alienating people who are not already fully committed to the physical science enterprise.
PS: Since magnetism interacts with stuff (has a coupling factor) via photons, why don't physicists seem to ever state the wavelengths involved? This is one of those things that should be pretty darn solid and straightforward, but Greene prefers to dream about other hidden things that are a lot more unbelievable.
- Was this review helpful to you?
Tags
All user tags (2)
- colbert report (by 1 person)
- colbert report guest books 2011 (by 1 person)
- 1 items are tagged withcolbert report
- 1 items are tagged withcolbert report guest books 2011
Similar Items
Related Subjects:(8)
- Physics -- Philosophy -- Popular works.
- Quantum theory -- Popular works.
- General relativity (Physics) -- Popular works.
- Cosmology -- Popular works.
- Physics -- Philosophy.
- Quantum theory.
- Relativity (Physics)
- Cosmology.
User lists with this item (16)
- Future Reads(154 items)
by RandomDSdevel updated about 2 weeks ago
- Things to Check Out(266 items)
by Tom_Hunt updated about 2 weeks ago
- LastRanger(141 items)
by JerryWagner updated about 3 weeks ago
- Cosmology(14 items)
by djnevin updated 2013-02-05
- Things to Check Out(11 items)
by anyasav updated 2012-12-09


