skip to content
Hypocrisy and integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the ethics of politics Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Hypocrisy and integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the ethics of politics

Author: Ruth Weissbourd Grant
Publisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Edition/Format:   Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
In her new book Ruth W. Grant challenges the usual standards for political ethics. Arguing that hypocrisy can be constructive and that strictly principled behavior can be destructive, she explores the full range of ethical choices by brilliantly distinguishing among the varieties of hypocrisy and integrity.
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Named Person: Niccolò Machiavelli; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Niccolò Machiavelli; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Niccolò Machiavelli; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Nicolau Maquiavel; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Niccolò Machiavelli; Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Material Type: Internet resource
Document Type: Book, Internet Resource
All Authors / Contributors: Ruth Weissbourd Grant
ISBN: 0226305821 9780226305820 0226305848 9780226305844
OCLC Number: 35784472
Description: xii, 201 pages ; 23 cm
Contents: Ch. 1. Introduction --
Ch. 2. Machiavelli and the Case for Hypocrisy --
Ch. 3. Moliere, Rousseau, and the Ideal of Integrity --
Ch. 4. Rousseau's Political Ethics: Integrity, Prudence, and Deception --
Ch. 5. Rousseau's Political Ethics: Corruption, Dependence, and Vanity --
Ch. 6. Conclusion.
Responsibility: Ruth W. Grant.
More information:

Abstract:

Arguing that hypocrisy can be constructive and that strictly principled behaviour can be destructive, this book explores a range of ethical alternatives, distinguishing the various types of hypocrisy  Read more...

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/35784472>
library:oclcnum"35784472"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"1997"
schema:description"Grant focuses primarily on the works of Machiavelli and Rousseau. While Machiavelli is often understood as arguing for the necessity of hypocrisy, Rousseau is portrayed as an antihypocrite who advocates a principled idealism. Grant's reinterpretation of these thinkers, however, allows us to see their considerable common ground. Both understood that political relationships require hypocrisy, since such ties are formed and maintained among people whose interests conflict and who need, yet cannot trust, one another. Both also appreciated the inevitable allure of ambition, vanity, and pride in building and maintaining these relationships. In this light, Machiavelli and Rousseau could be considered critics of the liberal project, which both would view as an ultimately fruitless attempt to establish open, honest, and rational politics."@en
schema:description"Ch. 1. Introduction -- Ch. 2. Machiavelli and the Case for Hypocrisy -- Ch. 3. Moliere, Rousseau, and the Ideal of Integrity -- Ch. 4. Rousseau's Political Ethics: Integrity, Prudence, and Deception -- Ch. 5. Rousseau's Political Ethics: Corruption, Dependence, and Vanity -- Ch. 6. Conclusion."@en
schema:description"As Grant reveals, hypocrisy can be found in the most unlikely people - be they "moralists," with their unwavering devotion to principle, or moderates, with their complacency toward injustice. Rather than condemning hypocrisy altogether, then, one must subtly discriminate among its various forms. Drawing on a wealth of material, from Moliere's comedies to Rousseau's conception of political integrity, Grant offers a new conceptual framework, one that clarifies the differences between idealism and fanaticism, moderation and rationalization. Her inquiry uncovers the moral limits of compromise and argues that we must judge political behavior with a discerning eye, keeping the images of integrity that guide our judgment always within our sight."@en
schema:description"In her new book Ruth W. Grant challenges the usual standards for political ethics. Arguing that hypocrisy can be constructive and that strictly principled behavior can be destructive, she explores the full range of ethical choices by brilliantly distinguishing among the varieties of hypocrisy and integrity."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/794203165>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Hypocrisy and integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the ethics of politics"@en
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
umbel:isLike<http://bnb.data.bl.uk/id/resource/GB9761852>
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.