Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
|All Authors / Contributors:||
|Description:||viii, 209 pages ; 24 cm|
|Contents:||Principles and Features of the Criminal Trial --
Challenging the Reliability of DNA Evidence --
The Admissibility of Expert Evidence --
The Interpretation and Presentation of DNA Evidence --
Evaluating the Weight of Scientific Evidence --
The Impact of the Scientific Evidence on the Criminal Trial.
"This book explores challenges posed by the use of DNA evidence to the traditional features, procedures and principles of the criminal trial. It examines some limitations of existing theories of the criminal trial process in the face of the increased use of scientific evidence in the court room. The research elucidates the interconnections at trial of three epistemologies, namely legal reasoning, as represented by counsel and trial judge, common sense manifested by the jury and scientific reasoning expounded by the expert witness. Scientific reasoning is part of this hybrid of trial languages and practices but its extended use is producing specifically novel tensions which impact on the traditional criminal trial landscape. Through the lens of DNA evidence, Oriola Sallavaci investigates how far the use of scientific evidence in the fact finding process poses challenges for the adversarial character of the proceedings and rules of evidence; how it affects the role of the judge, jury and expert witness, as well as the principle of orality and continuity of the trial. In comparing the challenges faced in English common law trials to those of the USA, this book has international scope, and will be of great use and interest to students and researchers of Criminal Law and Practice, Policing, and Forensics in Law"--