ข้ามไปที่เนือ้หา
View online Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving,... แสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ปิดแสดงตัวอย่างรายการนี้
ตรวจสอบ...

Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and Scientometrics

ผู้แต่ง: Dirks, Lee; Hey, Tony; Brody, Tim; Carr, Les; Gingras, Yves; Hajjem, Chawki; Harnad, Stevan; Swan, Alma
ครั้งที่พิมพ์/รูปแบบ:   บทความที่ดาวน์โหลดได้
สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14418/1/ctwatch.html
ฐานข้อมูล:WorldCat
สรุป:
The research production cycle has three components: the conduct of the research itself (R), the data (D), and the peer-reviewed publication (P) of the findings. Open Access (OA) means free online access to the publications (P-OA), but OA can also be extended to the data (D-OA). The two hurdles for D-OA are that not all researchers want to make their data OA and that the online infrastructure for D-OA still needs  อ่านมากขึ้น…
คะแนน:

(ยังไม่ให้คะแนน) 0 กับความคิดเห็น - เป็นคนแรก

เพิ่มเติมเช่นนี้

 

ค้นหาสำเนาออนไลน์

เชื่อมโยงไปยังรายการนี้

ค้นหาสำเนาในห้องสมุด

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; ค้นหาห้องสมุดที่มีรายการนี้

รายละเอียด

ประเภท/แบบฟอร์ม Article
NonPeerReviewed
ขนิดวัสดุ: ทรัพยากรอินแทอร์เน็ต
ประเภทของเอกสาร: แหล่งข้อมูลอินเทอร์เน็ต, บทความ
ผู้แต่งทั้งหมด : ผู้แต่งร่วม Dirks, Lee; Hey, Tony; Brody, Tim; Carr, Les; Gingras, Yves; Hajjem, Chawki; Harnad, Stevan; Swan, Alma
OCLC Number: 690307331
หมายเหตุ: text/html

บทคัดย่อ:

The research production cycle has three components: the conduct of the research itself (R), the data (D), and the peer-reviewed publication (P) of the findings. Open Access (OA) means free online access to the publications (P-OA), but OA can also be extended to the data (D-OA). The two hurdles for D-OA are that not all researchers want to make their data OA and that the online infrastructure for D-OA still needs additional functionality. In contrast, all researchers, without exception, do want to make their publications P-OA, and the online infrastructure for publication-archiving (a worldwide interoperable network of OAI-compliant Institutional Repositories [IRs]) already has all the requisite functionality for this. Yet because so far only about 15% of researchers are spontaneously self-archiving their publications today, their funders and institutions are beginning to mandate OA self-archiving in order to maximize the usage and impact of their research output. The adoption of these P-OA self-archiving mandates needs to be accelerated. Researchers’ careers and funding already depend on the impact (usage and citation) of their research. It has now been repeatedly demonstrated that making publications OA by self-archiving them in an OA IR dramatically enhances their research impact. Research metrics (e.g., download and citation counts) are increasingly being used to estimate and reward research impact, notably in the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). But those metrics first need to be tested against human panel-based rankings in order to validate their predictive power. Publications, their metadata, and their metrics are the database for the new science of Scientometrics. The UK’s RAE, based on the research output of all disciplines from an entire nation, provides a unique opportunity for validating research metrics. In validating RAE metrics (through multiple regression analysis) against panel rankings, the publication (P) archive will be used as a data (D) ar

รีวิว

ความคิดเห็นผู้ที่ใช้งาน
กำลังค้นคืน รีวิว GoodReads…
ค้นคืน DOGObooks บทวิจารณ์

แท็ก

แท็กทั้งหมดของผู้ใช้ (2)

ดูแท็กที่นิยมมากที่สุดเป็น: รายชื่อแท็ก | แท็ก Cloud

ยืนยันคำขอนี้

คุณอาจะร้องขอรายการนี้แล้. โปรดเลือก ตกลง ถ้าคุณต้องการดำเนินการคำขอนี้ต่อไป.

เชิ่อมโยงข้อมูล


Primary Entity

<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/690307331> # Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and Scientometrics
    a pto:Web_document, schema:Article, schema:CreativeWork, schema:MediaObject ;
    library:oclcnum "690307331" ;
    schema:contributor <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/hey_tony> ; # Hey, Tony
    schema:contributor <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/dirks_lee> ; # Dirks, Lee
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/harnad_stevan> ; # Harnad, Stevan
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/gingras_yves> ; # Gingras, Yves
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/swan_alma> ; # Swan, Alma
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/brody_tim> ; # Brody, Tim
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/hajjem_chawki> ; # Hajjem, Chawki
    schema:creator <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/carr_les> ; # Carr, Les
    schema:description "The research production cycle has three components: the conduct of the research itself (R), the data (D), and the peer-reviewed publication (P) of the findings. Open Access (OA) means free online access to the publications (P-OA), but OA can also be extended to the data (D-OA). The two hurdles for D-OA are that not all researchers want to make their data OA and that the online infrastructure for D-OA still needs additional functionality. In contrast, all researchers, without exception, do want to make their publications P-OA, and the online infrastructure for publication-archiving (a worldwide interoperable network of OAI-compliant Institutional Repositories [IRs]) already has all the requisite functionality for this. Yet because so far only about 15% of researchers are spontaneously self-archiving their publications today, their funders and institutions are beginning to mandate OA self-archiving in order to maximize the usage and impact of their research output. The adoption of these P-OA self-archiving mandates needs to be accelerated. Researchers’ careers and funding already depend on the impact (usage and citation) of their research. It has now been repeatedly demonstrated that making publications OA by self-archiving them in an OA IR dramatically enhances their research impact. Research metrics (e.g., download and citation counts) are increasingly being used to estimate and reward research impact, notably in the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). But those metrics first need to be tested against human panel-based rankings in order to validate their predictive power. Publications, their metadata, and their metrics are the database for the new science of Scientometrics. The UK’s RAE, based on the research output of all disciplines from an entire nation, provides a unique opportunity for validating research metrics. In validating RAE metrics (through multiple regression analysis) against panel rankings, the publication (P) archive will be used as a data (D) ar" ;
    schema:exampleOfWork <http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/762995864> ;
    schema:genre "NonPeerReviewed" ;
    schema:genre "Article" ;
    schema:name "Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and Scientometrics" ;
    schema:productID "690307331" ;
    schema:url <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14418/1/ctwatch.html> ;
    wdrs:describedby <http://www.worldcat.org/title/-/oclc/690307331> ;
    .


Related Entities

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/gingras_yves> # Gingras, Yves
    a bgn:Agent ;
    schema:name "Gingras, Yves" ;
    .

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/hajjem_chawki> # Hajjem, Chawki
    a bgn:Agent ;
    schema:name "Hajjem, Chawki" ;
    .

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/762995864#Agent/harnad_stevan> # Harnad, Stevan
    a bgn:Agent ;
    schema:name "Harnad, Stevan" ;
    .


Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

กรุณาลงชื่อเข้าสู่ระบบ WorldCat 

ยังไม่มีบัญชีผู้ใช้? คุณสามารถสร้างได้อย่างง่ายดาย สร้างบัญชีผู้ใช้ฟรี.